Abetment of Suicide Positive Act Of Instigation Necessary for Conviction U/S 306 IPC: Gujarat High Court Reiterates

Abetment of Suicide Positive Act Of Instigation Necessary for Conviction U/S 306 IPC: Gujarat High Court Reiterates

Case: State Of Gujarat Versus Raval Deepakkkumar Shankerchand & 2 Other(S)

Coram: Justice SH Vora and Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt

Case No.: R/CR.A/1125/1995

Court Observation: “The essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 IPC are: (i) the abetment; (ii) the intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide. The act of the accused, however, insulting the deceased by using abusive language will not, by itself, constitute the abetment of suicide. There should be evidence capable of suggesting that the accused intended by such act to instigate the deceased to commit suicide.”

“Thus, the prosecution could not establish the case under Section 498(A) and 306 of the Indian Penal Code by adducing convincing evidence and the trial Court has rightly found that presumption under Section 113 of the Indian Evidence Act cannot be applied in the present case where the prosecution has failed to prove the aspect of harassment caused by the accused to the deceased through the evidence of PW Nos.1 to 3, who are the nearest relatives of the deceased.”

“Abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding a person in doing of a thing. Without a positive act on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide, conviction cannot be sustained. The intention of the legislature and the ratio of the cases decided by this Court is clear that in order to convict a person under Section 306 IPC there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and that act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he committed suicide.”

Previous Posts

Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Details Of SC Collegiums December 2018 Meeting

Passport Renewal Request Cant Be Rejected On Sole Basis of Pendency of Criminal Cases: Orissa High Court

Victim Cant Prefer Appeal U/S 372 CrPC Proviso Challenging Adequacy of Sentence Imposed On Convict: Kerala High Court

Stand of Defendant Irrelevant When Court Is Dealing With Application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC: Delhi High Court

Madras High Court Evokes Doctrine of Approbate & Reprobate, Holds a Party Can’t Take Contradictory Stands in Different Courts

Person Ineligible U/s 29A IBC To Submit Resolution Plan Cannot Propose Scheme Of Compromise & Arrangement U/s 230 Companies Act 2013: Supreme Court Download Judgement

Courts Exist For Convenience of Litigants, Not Advocates: Bombay HC Rejects Bar Associations Plea against Establishment of Court at Wai