Arbitral Tribunal’s Order Rejecting The Application For Impleadment Of Party Doesn’t Constitute An ‘Interim Award’: Delhi High Court

Case: Goyal Mg Gases Pvt Ltd vs. Panama Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors.

Coram: Justices Najmi Waziri and Sudhir Kumar Jain

Case No.: FAO(OS) (COMM) 217/2019

Court Observation: “Accordingly, an order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting the application for impleadment neither decides the substantive question of law nor touches upon the merits of the case. The impugned order, as such, has not travelled the distance to answer the attributes of determination of an issue,” “The learned Sole Arbitrator rightly observed that the subsequent transferees are neither the necessary parties nor proper parties for disposal of the claims and arbitral proceedings can proceed between the appellant and the respondents and if the decree is passed in favour of the appellant, in that eventuality subsequent sale agreement shall become null and void.”

Previous Posts

Investigation Into Non-Cognizable Offences Without Magistrate’s Permission Can’t Be Regularised By Subsequently Adding Cognizable Offences: J&K High Court

Well Owners Selling Water Through Tankers Must Obtain Licenses And Conform To Food Safety Act: Kerala High Court

Registration Of Other Cases Can’t Be Sole Ground To Refuse Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Relief To Retd Army Personnel In Fraud Case

Standard Essential Patent Owners Can Pray For Interim And Final Injunctive Relief If Infringer Deemed To Be An ‘Unwilling Licensee’: Delhi High Court

Mumbai Metro: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Against Line 4; Says No Legal Error In Alignment, Acquisition Proceedings

Keywords

Arbitral Tribunal’s Order