Avoid Shortcut Approach In Judgments; Courts Must Adjudicate All Issues
Case: Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Bangalore vs State of Karnataka
Coram: Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna
Case No.: CA 1345-1346 OF 2022
Court Observation: “Therefore, the courts should adjudicate on all the issues and give its findings on all the issues and not to pronounce the judgment only on one of the issues. As such it is the duty cast upon the courts to adjudicate on all the issues and pronounce the judgment on all the issues rather than adopting a shortcut approach and pronouncing the judgment on only one issue. By such a practice, it would increase the burden on the appellate court and in many cases if the decision on the issue decided is found to be erroneous and on other issues there is no adjudication and no findings recorded by the court, the appellate court will have no option but to remand the matter for its fresh decision. Therefore, to avoid such an eventuality, the courts have to adjudicate on all the issues raised in a case and render findings and the judgment on all the issues involved.”
Previous Posts
Nothing On Record To Even Remotely Suggest That The Act Was Consensual: Supreme Court Upholds Rape Conviction Download Judgement
Keywords
Avoid Shortcut Approach, Judgments