Merely Because Some Benefit Accrued To Litigant Due To Interim Order, They Cannot Claim Such Benefits When Litigation Ends Against Them

Case: Kumanbhai Chatrabhjubhaihujbhadaraniya & 18 Other(S) VS Manavadar Municipality & 14 Other(S)

Coram: Justice Biren Vaishnav

Case No.: C/SA/164/2002

Court Observation: “What is therefore evident is that no fault can be found inasmuch as the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court committed no error in holding that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a civil suit under section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the face of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947.”

“This Court is unable to accept the view propounded by the courts below and is of the considered opinion that the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a suit structured on the provisions of the ID Act.”

Previous Posts

Appeals Against ITAT Order Will Lie Only Before The High Court Within Whose Jurisdiction The Assessing Officer Is Situated: Supreme Court

Contract Discharged By Settlement – Dispute Under Contract Is A Deadwood; Cannot Be Referred To Arbitration: Bombay High Court

Judges Can’t Overstep Defined Jurisdiction & Expose Administration Of Justice To Individualistic Whims & Fancies: J&K&L High Court

Disabled Employee Should Not Be Forced To Forfeit Seniority For Choosing Posting Place As Per Beneficial Circular: Supreme Court

Years Of Service Alone Does Not Entitle A Daily Wager To Regularization, Eligibility To The Post Paramount Consideration: J&K&L High Court

Preliminary Issues Are Determined Purely On Point Of Law In Isolation To Facts: Tripura High Court

Keywords

Benefit Accrued To Litigant, Interim Order