Bombay High Court nullifies the proclamation order against the police Naik accused of raping a Lady Police Naik, asserting the necessity of providing at least 30 days’ notice for court appearance

Case: Deepak Sitaram Modhe v. State of Maharashtra

Coram: Justice Sarang V Kotwal

Case No.: Criminal Application No. 1647 of 2023

Court Observation: “All the above three orders have taken this provision into consideration and in all these orders it is mentioned that the period cannot be less than 30 days. In the present case, the order is passed on 29.11.2023 and the applicant was directed to appear on 04.12.2023. Therefore, I am inclined to take a similar view which is taken in all the aforesaid orders”

Previous Posts

FIRs in rape cases involving minors are not mere printed papers; rather, they reflect the profound trauma experienced by the victims: Delhi High Court

Kalamassery Bomb Blasts | Kerala High Court Orders the Transfer of Zamra Convention Centre to Its Managing Director

While the Railway Vigilance Manual is procedural, its significance should not be disregarded, as it serves to protect employees from false implications: Andhra Pradesh High Court

A person who has migrated to another state shall only be entitled to the benefit of reservation in the state of their origin: Jharkhand High Court

Gauhati High Court orders the Assam Police to pay ₹5 lakh in compensation to an advocate for handcuffing him without just cause

Keywords

Bombay High Court nullifies the proclamation order