Can’t Refer Dispute To Arbitration Unless There Is A Clear, Unequivocal Denial Of A Right: Kerala High Court

Can’t Refer Dispute To Arbitration Unless There Is A Clear, Unequivocal Denial Of A Right

Case: Southern Railway v. M/s Cherian Varkey Construction Co. Pvt Ltd

Coram: Justice P.B. Suresh Kumar and Justice C.S Sudha

Case No.: ARB.A NO. 33 OF 2020

Court Observation: “Since a dispute entails a positive element, a mere inaction to pay does not lead to the inference that a dispute exists and there is no right to apply for reference of a dispute to arbitration until there is a clear and unequivocal denial of the right asserted by one party by the other.”

Southern-Railway-v.-Ms-Cherian-Varkey-Construction-Co.-Pvt-Ltd-2-July-1Download

Previous Posts

Compassionate Appointment Intended To Provide “Urgent Relief” To Bereaved Family: Gujarat High Court Refuses To Grant Benefit After 5 Yrs Of Death

J&K&L High Court Grants ₹5 Lakh Compensation To Reserved Category Candidate Denied Seat In NEET MDS 2021, Asks BOPEE To Keep One Seat In Next Session

Potential Cabinet Papers Yet To Be Brought Before Council Of Ministers Exempted From Disclosure Under RTI Act: Kerala High Court

Waiting List Can’t Be Used As ‘Reservoir’ To Fill Posts Falling Vacant Due To Resignation Of Selected Candidate: Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Conviction Cannot Be Solely On Extra Judicial Confession Unless Supported By Chain Of Cogent Circumstances: Madras High Court

Govt Can’t Supersede Statutory Rules By Administrative Orders, May Fill Gaps With Consistent Instructions: Jammu & Kashmir High Court

No Absolute Right Under RTE Act For Admission To Unaided Minority Schools: Bombay High Court

ESI Act Applicable To BCCI As Its Activities Are Commercial In Nature: Bombay High Court

Company Tribunal Not A Labour Court Or Administrative Tribunal To Focus Entirely On Removal Of Director: Supreme Court In Tata-Mistry Case Download Judgement

Keywords

Refer Dispute To Arbitration, Unequivocal Denial Of A Right

Related Articles

Tags: , , , ,