Can’t Use Municipality-Owned Shopping Complex’s Parking Space For Dharna Or Public Meeting Without Official Permission: Kerala High Court

Can’t Use Municipality-Owned Shopping Complex’s Parking Space For Dharna Or Public Meeting Without Official Permission: Kerala High Court

Case: Priyesh B Kartha V. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

Coram: Justice N Nagaresh

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 7181 OF 2023

Court Observation: “Though every citizen has a right to access to the Shops in the building, the open space is intended for parking of the vehicles of the customers only. Therefore, such spaces can have a status of semi-public space only. No organisation or group of citizens can claim a right to organise Dharna or public meeting in such places, without the permission of the Municipality.”

“Exercise of many of the fundamental rights by citizens like freedom of expression, right to assemble, right to travel, etc., depend on the availability of physical public space. Absence of public space may hinder exercise of many human rights. Human Rights activists across the world often argue in favour of Right to Public Space. Constitution of India also recognised the importance of public spaces. Article 15 states that persons who are citizens of India must have equal access to public places like Shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment.” “Rule 17 of the Rules, 2019 makes it the duty and responsibility of the owner/developer to furnish details of parking spaces and area earmarked. After construction of a building, the parking area earmarked for the building cannot be used for any other purpose unauthorisedly. Such parking spaces cannot be converted as autorickshaw stand or taxi stand either,”

Previous Posts

Orissa High Court Asks Collector To Reconsider Appeal For Issuance Of ST Certificate On Basis Of Mother’s Tribe

Father Cannot Avoid Paying Maintenance To Child By Seeking Frivolous Paternity Test: Bombay High Court

Two Authorities Empowered To Redress Same Grievance Via Two Different Procedures: Kerala High Court Points Lacuna In 2008 Wetland Conservation Rules

Arbitral Tribunal’s Order Rejecting The Application For Impleadment Of Party Doesn’t Constitute An ‘Interim Award’: Delhi High Court

Statement Recorded U/S 164 Or 161 CrPC Can’t Be Treated As Substantive Evidence Without Opportunity Of Cross-Examination To Defence: Patna High Court

Keywords

Can’t Use Municipality-Owned property