District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

District Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court

District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution Case: High Court of Delhi v.…

Continue ReadingDistrict Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court
Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence Case:…

Continue ReadingParty Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court
Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice Case: Tedhi Singh…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced Case: Sanjay…

Continue ReadingOrder 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court
States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life Case: SK Naushad Rahman and others vs Union of India Coram: Justice…

Continue ReadingStates Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court