Uttarakhand-High-Court-Pulls-Up-Family-Court-For-Not-Allowing-US-Resident-To-File-Divorce-Petition-Through-POA-Holder-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Uttarakhand High Court Pulls Up Family Court For Not Allowing US Resident To File Divorce Petition Through POA Holder

Uttarakhand High Court Pulls Up Family Court For Not Allowing US Resident To File Divorce Petition Through POA Holder Case: Dr. Surjeet v. Dr. Namita…

Continue ReadingUttarakhand High Court Pulls Up Family Court For Not Allowing US Resident To File Divorce Petition Through POA Holder
State-Does-Not-Have-Unlimited-Resources-Institutions-That-Waive-Arrears-To-Seek-Grant-In-Aid-Can't-Be-Permitted-To-Take-U-Turn-Uttarakhand-HC-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

State Does Not Have Unlimited Resources, Institutions That Waive Arrears To Seek Grant-In-Aid Can’t Be Permitted To Take U-Turn: Uttarakhand HC

State Does Not Have Unlimited Resources, Institutions That Waive Arrears To Seek Grant-In-Aid Can't Be Permitted To Take U-Turn Case: Dr. Baldev Prasad Chamoli and…

Continue ReadingState Does Not Have Unlimited Resources, Institutions That Waive Arrears To Seek Grant-In-Aid Can’t Be Permitted To Take U-Turn: Uttarakhand HC
Court-In-Area-Where-Minor-Ordinarily-Resides-Has-Jurisdiction-U/S-25-Guardians-&-Wards-Act:-Uttarakhand-High-Court-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Court In Area Where Minor Ordinarily Resides Has Jurisdiction U/S 25 Guardians & Wards Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Court In Area Where Minor Ordinarily Resides Has Jurisdiction U/S 25 Guardians & Wards Act Case: Abhishek Rajput v Smt. Pooja Rajput & another Coram:…

Continue ReadingCourt In Area Where Minor Ordinarily Resides Has Jurisdiction U/S 25 Guardians & Wards Act: Uttarakhand High Court
Uttarakhand-Govt-Servants-Rules-2002-Adverse-Service-Report-Not-Communicated-To-Employee-Can't-Be-Used-To-Deny-Promotion-High-Court-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Uttarakhand Govt Servants Rules 2002 | Adverse Service Report Not Communicated To Employee Can’t Be Used To Deny Promotion: High Court

Uttarakhand Govt Servants Rules 2002 | Adverse Service Report Not Communicated To Employee Can't Be Used To Deny Promotion Case: Veer Singh Yadav v State…

Continue ReadingUttarakhand Govt Servants Rules 2002 | Adverse Service Report Not Communicated To Employee Can’t Be Used To Deny Promotion: High Court
Can't Presume That No Rules For Promotion Exist Merely Because Order Sanctioning The Post Does Not Indicate Such Rules: Uttarakhand High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Can’t Presume That No Rules For Promotion Exist Merely Because Order Sanctioning The Post Does Not Indicate Such Rules: Uttarakhand High Court

Can't Presume That No Rules For Promotion Exist Merely Because Order Sanctioning The Post Does Not Indicate Such Rules Case: Krishna Kuwar Singh Dewari &…

Continue ReadingCan’t Presume That No Rules For Promotion Exist Merely Because Order Sanctioning The Post Does Not Indicate Such Rules: Uttarakhand High Court
Cancellation Of GST Registration Affects Right To Livelihood, Writ Petition Is Maintainable: Uttarakhand High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Cancellation Of GST Registration Affects Right To Livelihood, Writ Petition Is Maintainable: Uttarakhand High Court

Cancellation Of GST Registration Affects Right To Livelihood, Writ Petition Is Maintainable Case: Vinod Kumar Versus Commissioner Uttarakhand State GST and others Coram: Chief Justice…

Continue ReadingCancellation Of GST Registration Affects Right To Livelihood, Writ Petition Is Maintainable: Uttarakhand High Court
Pawns in Hands of Political Powers: Calcutta HC Reduces Sentence of Agricultural Labourers Convicted For Assaulting Man Over Political Rivalry - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Amendment To Recruitment Rules “Enlarging” Scope Of Eligibility Criteria During Selection Process

Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Amendment To Recruitment Rules "Enlarging" Scope Of Eligibility Criteria During Selection Process Case: Om Prakash Gaur & another v. State of…

Continue ReadingUttarakhand High Court Upholds Amendment To Recruitment Rules “Enlarging” Scope Of Eligibility Criteria During Selection Process
Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can't Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court - the Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can’t Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can't Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act Case: Mohit v. State of Uttarakhand Coram: Acting…

Continue ReadingRight of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can’t Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court
Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act Case: Mohit v. State of Uttarakhand Coram: Acting…

Continue ReadingRight of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court
No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC

"No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country": Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC Case: Heera Singh Pangtey…

Continue ReadingNo Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC