Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages: Supreme Court

Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages

Case: State of Punjab vs Dev Brat Sharma

Coram: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath

Case No.: CA 2064 OF 2022

Court Observation: Therefore, there would be no question at all for the applicability of Section 7(iv) of the Act. It would be a simple case of applicability of Section 7(i) of the Act and ad valorem Court-fees would have to be paid as per Schedule 1 entry 1…It is only with respect to the category of suits specified in clause (iv) of Section 7 of the Act that the plaintiff has the liberty of stating in the plaint the amount at which relief is valued and Court-fees would be payable on the said amount. Liberty given under clause (iv) to the specific suits of six categories is not available to the suits falling under any other clause, be it (i), (ii), (iii) etc. Once the suit in question was a money suit for compensation and damages falling under clause (i) of Section 7 of the Act, ad valorem Court-fees would be payable on the amount claimed.

“Neither in the case of M/s Commercial Aviation (supra) nor in the case of Chettiar (supra), this Court ever laid down that for the purposes of suits covered by clauses other than Section 7(iv), there could be separate valuation for the purposes of court fees and jurisdiction. On a completely erroneous approach, an erroneous interpretation of the judgments in the case of M/s. Commercial Aviation (supra) and Chettiar (supra), several orders were passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which have been relied upon in the impugned judgment”

Previous Posts

Section 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court

Section 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement: Supreme Court

No Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension: Supreme Court Upholds Centre’s OROP Policy In Defence Forces

Passport Cannot Be Denied To Child on Sole Ground That One Parent Is Non-Indian Citizen: Kerala High Court

Armed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226: Delhi HC

Rusk Is Different from Bread, VAT Exemption Available To Bread Can’t Be Extended To Rusk: Meghalaya High Court

Rubbing Male Organ on Vagina or Urethra over Victim’s Underpants Amounts to Rape: Meghalaya High Court

Second Appeal: Judgment Should Not Be Interfered With By High Court Unless There Is A Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates Supreme Court Download Judgement

Keywords

Court Fees Act 1870, Court-Fees