Court Fees Act – Market Value Does Not Become Decisive Of Valuation Merely Because Litigation Involves Immovable Property
Case: Bharat Bhushan Gupta v. Pratap Narain Verma And Anr.
Corum: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath
Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 4577 of 2022
Court Observation: “…market value of the suit property was around Rs.1.8 crores at the time of the filing of the suit. It is apparent thus, that the valuation of the suit for the purpose of Court Fees and jurisdiction at Rs.250 for each of the reliefs of injunction is wholly arbitrary.”
Previous Posts
CLAT Clearance Mandate For NTPC Law Officer Appointment Violative Of Article 16: Kerala High Court
Services Rendered Abroad Amounts to Export Of Services, No GST Applicable: Bombay High Court
Dying Declaration Can Be Sole Basis For Conviction Only When Court Is Satisfied That It Is True And Voluntary, Reiterates Supreme Court Download Judgement
Keywords
Court Fees Act, Immovable Property
Related Articles
- Income Tax Act | To Compute Deduction Under S. 80-IA, Market Value Of Electricity Is The Rate At Which State Board Supplies Power : Supreme Court
- NCLT Kochi: Sale of Corporate Debtor’s Property can’t be termed “fraudulent” merely on an unsupported claim of security interest
- Will Can’t Be Presumed To Be Valid Merely Because It Is Registered: Supreme Court
