Crowdfunding and Tokenized Investments: Legal Frameworks for Equity Crowdfunding and Security Token Offerings (STOs)

  • Post category:Blog
  • Reading time:6 mins read

Crowdfunding and Tokenized Investments: Legal Frameworks for Equity Crowdfunding and Security Token Offerings (STOs)

Written by Sowndarya Shukla

Table of Contents

The financial landscape has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of digital technologies, offering new methods of raising capital for startups and businesses. Among the most innovative approaches are crowdfunding and tokenized investments, especially equity crowdfunding and Security Token Offerings (STOs). These models democratize investment opportunities, allowing small investors to fund and own equity or assets that were traditionally reserved for venture capitalists and institutional investors.

While these models offer immense potential, they also introduce complex legal and regulatory challenges. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving legal frameworks governing equity crowdfunding and STOs, with a focus on global trends and the regulatory landscape in India.

Understanding Equity Crowdfunding and STOs

Equity Crowdfunding involves raising capital by offering shares in a company to a large number of investors, usually through online platforms. Unlike donation-based or rewards-based crowdfunding, equity crowdfunding gives contributors a stake in the business.

Security Token Offerings (STOs) refer to the issuance of digital tokens that represent ownership rights, debt instruments, or other financial interests. These tokens are typically created on blockchain platforms and are subject to securities regulations in most jurisdictions due to their investment nature.

Both mechanisms aim to unlock new sources of funding but must operate within robust legal frameworks to protect investors and ensure market integrity.

Global Perspective

  • United States: Equity crowdfunding is regulated under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. Regulation Crowdfunding allows companies to raise up to $5 million annually from both accredited and non-accredited investors, subject to disclosure and compliance requirements enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
  • European Union: The European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation (ECSPR), effective from November 2021, harmonizes crowdfunding regulations across EU member states. It allows platforms to operate cross-border and imposes investor protection standards, including risk warnings and investment caps.
  • United Kingdom: The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) oversees equity crowdfunding and requires platforms to conduct due diligence, provide risk disclosures, and ensure fair treatment of investors.

India’s Regulatory Position

In India, equity crowdfunding is not fully legalized due to concerns over investor protection and potential misuse. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a consultation paper in 2014 but has not implemented formal regulations.

Key points of concern include:

  • Risk of fraud and poor due diligence on platforms
  • Absence of secondary markets for shares
  • Lack of investor awareness and recourse mechanisms

However, certain regulated models like Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and angel investment platforms function in a similar spirit, albeit under stricter controls.

STOs are hybrid instruments that blend features of traditional securities with blockchain technology. They require compliance with securities laws, irrespective of the technological medium used for issuance.

Global Regulatory Approaches

  • United States: The SEC treats most tokens as securities under the Howey Test. STOs must either be registered or exempt under regulations like Reg D, Reg S, or Reg A+. Non-compliance leads to enforcement actions and investor risks.
  • Switzerland: Regarded as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has provided clear guidance on classifying tokens as payment, utility, or asset tokens. STOs fall under asset tokens and are subject to financial market laws.
  • Singapore: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) requires STO issuers to comply with the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). Issuers must provide a prospectus unless exempt and ensure proper AML/KYC practices.

India’s Regulatory Landscape

India does not yet have specific regulations for STOs. SEBI and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) remain cautious due to the lack of legal clarity around cryptocurrencies and digital assets. However, developments suggest a gradual openness toward regulated tokenized assets.

Current challenges in the Indian context:

  • No legal recognition of crypto-assets as securities or commodities
  • Overlap between securities law, technology law, and financial regulation
  • Restrictions under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) for overseas STOs

In the absence of a clear legal route, Indian firms seeking STOs often look to launch offerings in crypto-friendly jurisdictions.

  1. Securities Classification: If tokens represent equity, debt, or a share in profits, they are likely to be considered securities. This subjects them to disclosure, registration, and compliance obligations.
  2. Investor Protections: Regulators seek to ensure that STO and crowdfunding platforms conduct proper due diligence, disclose risks, and prevent fraud. This includes implementing know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) protocols.
  3. Jurisdiction and Legal Liability: Cross-border offerings raise complex questions about jurisdiction, applicable law, and dispute resolution. Platforms must be aware of the extraterritorial reach of certain laws (e.g., U.S. securities law).
  4. Smart Contract Validity: In STOs, smart contracts automate token issuance and compliance. However, questions remain about the enforceability of these contracts in courts, especially in jurisdictions where blockchain laws are underdeveloped.
  5. Taxation: The tax treatment of returns from equity crowdfunding and tokenized assets remains inconsistent. In India, crypto assets are taxed at 30% gains with no deduction except for the cost of acquisition. How this applies to tokenized securities is unclear.

The Way Forward: Building a Balanced Regulatory Ecosystem

For both equity crowdfunding and STOs to thrive, a forward-looking and adaptive regulatory framework is essential. Recommendations include:

  • Creating a Regulatory Sandbox: India’s fintech sandbox by the RBI and SEBI could include pilots for STOs and regulated crowdfunding platforms to test compliance and market response.
  • Establishing Legal Definitions: Clear classification of digital tokens, smart contracts, and crowdfunding instruments will reduce ambiguity and foster innovation.
  • Investor Education: Retail investors must be educated about risks, rights, and due diligence before participating in these markets.
  • Cross-Border Harmonization: Global coordination on token classification and cross-border offerings will enhance investor confidence and market stability.

Conclusion

Equity crowdfunding and Security Token Offerings represent the future of decentralized and democratized capital raising. However, their success hinges on well-crafted legal frameworks that balance innovation with investor protection. As India and the world move toward digital finance, robust and flexible regulatory approaches are necessary to unlock the full potential of tokenized and crowd-sourced investment models, while safeguarding market integrity and public trust.

Tags: , , , ,