Decree-Holder Faces Same Problem In Execution As In 19th Century; Difficulties Of Litigant Begin After Obtaining Decree: Supreme Court

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:5 mins read

Decree-Holder Faces Same Problem In Execution As In 19th Century; Difficulties Of Litigant Begin After Obtaining Decree

Case: M/s. Griesheim GmbH (Now Called Air Liquide Deutschland GmbH) v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd.

Corum: Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka

Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 521 of 2022

Court Observation: “It is an old saying that the difficulties of the litigant in India begin when he has obtained a decree. The evil was noticed as far back in 1872 by the Privy Council in relation to the difficulties faced by the decree-holder in execution of the decree. After more than a century, there has been no improvement and still the decree holder faces the same problem what was being faced in the past,”

“A litigant coming to Court seeking relief is not interested in receiving a paper decree when he succeeds in establishing his case. What he primarily wants from the Court of Justice is the relief and if it is a money decree, he wants that money what he is entitled for in terms of the decree, must be satisfied by the judgment debtor at the earliest possible without fail keeping in view the reasonable restrictions/rights which are available to the judgment debtor under the provisions of the statute or the code, as the case may be”.

“…the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution”

“…the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution”

Previous Posts

State Cannot Dictate What Decisions Can Or Cannot Be Taken By A Public Trust: Supreme Court

High Courts With Original Civil Jurisdiction Can Also Execute Foreign Decrees Under Section 44A of CPC: Supreme Court

Reservation In Promotion- Supreme Court Declares That Its Judgment In M. Nagaraj Shall Have Only Prospective Effect

Final Relief Granted Need Not Be Natural Consequence Of Ratio Decidendi Of Judgment: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refuses To Express Views On Discontinuation Of Reservation; Moots Periodical Review Of Data On Inadequate Representation

FIR Not Necessary For Issuance Of Heirship Certificate If Person Missing More Than 7 Years: Kerala High Court Download Judgement