Judges Can’t Overstep Defined Jurisdiction & Expose Administration Of Justice To Individualistic Whims & Fancies

Case: Majid Nabi Khan Vs Executive Officer MC Bijbehara

Coram: Justice Rahul Bharti

Case No.: CM(M ) 130/2022

Court Observation: “The Additional District Judge, Anantnag parted with the judgment with wordings “appeal disposed of and be consigned to records after due compilation”. It is lost to imagination as to what fate the trial court order dated 21st April 2022 and suit of the petitioner was consigned by the Additional District Judge, Anantnag vide his said judgment”

“Everybody in the matter is at loss to know & show from the impugned judgment of the Additional District Judge as to what has been done to the trial court’s impugned order and labor invested to pass the said order which was taken in appeal, and also the paralysis of the civil suit lying on the file of the civil court to nobody’s understanding as to what disposal is left to be given to the suit”

Previous Posts

Years Of Service Alone Does Not Entitle A Daily Wager To Regularization, Eligibility To The Post Paramount Consideration: J&K&L High Court

Preliminary Issues Are Determined Purely On Point Of Law In Isolation To Facts: Tripura High Court

Pension Is Deferred Salary, Right To Pension A Constitutional Right: Kerala High Court

“Safe Harbour” Protection Available To Intermediaries Qua Criminal Prosecution Unless ‘Active Role’ Is Disclosed In Commission Of Offence: Delhi HC

Customs Authorities Cannot Encash Bank Guarantee Before Expiry Of The Limitation Period For Filing An Appeal: Bombay High Court

Delhi High Court Modifies POCSO Conviction To Less Grave Offence, Orders Release As Convict’s Imprisonment Exceeds Maximum Punishment

Order VIII Rule 6A CPC -Counter Claim Can Be Set Up Only ‘Against The Claim Of Plaintiffs’: Supreme Court

Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Is Mandatory; Suits Filed Violating This Liable To Be Rejected: Supreme Court

Keywords

Defined Jurisdiction,