Establishments In Notified Industrial Areas Exempted From Obtaining Building Permit From Local Bodies: Kerala High Court

Establishments In Notified Industrial Areas Exempted From Obtaining Building Permit From Local Bodies

Case: Ms Holmarc Opto Mechatronics (P) Ltd v. Secretary, Kalamassery Municipality & Ors.

Coram: Justice Shaji P. Chaly

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 3603 OF 2016

Court Observation: “I am of the undoubted opinion that when a statute exempts or grant benefits to industrial establishments located within the notified industrial areas, the local body is precluded from taking any action on the basis of the provisions of law applicable to other industrial establishments. I am also of the view that exemption is granted by the statute as well as the Government in order to promote industries within the State and to facilitate an easy mechanism for an industrialist to start the establishments without being saddled by the intricacies contained under various statutes, by resorting to the single window clearance methodology provided under Act 1999.”

“The order clearly specifies that the industrial units located in the Industrial Estates/Development Area/Mini Industrial Estate/a consolidated list of which are appended to the order, shall be exempted from obtaining clearances from local bodies.”

Previous Posts

Drugs & Cosmetics Act: Complainant Must Prove “Exclusive Possession” Of Premises By Accused From Where Recovery Is Made: Telangana High Court

Licence Under Places Of Public Resort Act Is Compulsory To Run A Gym: Kerala High Court

Hindu Marriage Act: Able-Bodied Husband Having Earning Capacity Can’t Seek Permanent Alimony From Wife: Karnataka High Court

Only God Can Save These Types Of Lawyers: Kerala High Court After Advocate Argues Against Interest Of His Client

Employment Conditions Can’t Take Away Employees’ Right To Seek Judicial Review Of Employer’s Actions: J&K&L High Court

Section 8 Application Should Be Filed Within Time Available For Filing Written Statement: Delhi High Court

Married Woman Wilfully Cohabitating With Another Man Can’t Prosecute Him For Rape Under False Promise Of Marriage: Telangana High Court

S.354 IPC Not Attracted If Woman Herself Didn’t Perceive The Act Of ‘Catching Hold Of Her Hand’ As Invading Her Decency: Telangana High Court

Pre-Condition Of Filing Complaint U/S 138 NI Act Not Fulfilled When Statutory Notice Of Demand Sent On Wrong Address: J&K&L High Court

Person Who Secures Appointment On The Basis Of A False Caste Certificate Cannot Be Permitted To Retain Benefit Of Wrongful Appointment: Supreme Court

Appeal Against Environmental Clearance Granted to Vishakapatnam Greenfield International Airport Restored By Supreme Court Before NGT Download Judgement