Onus Is On Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances About Execution Of Will: Supreme Court

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Onus Is On Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances About Execution Of Will

Case: Murthy vs C. Saradambal

Coram: Justices L. Nageswara Rao and BV Nagarathna

Case No.: CA 4270 OF 2010

Court Observation: (i) The signature of the testator may be very shaky and doubtful or not appear to be his usual signature. (ii) The condition of the testator’s mind may be very feeble and debilitated at the relevant time. (iii) The disposition may be unnatural, improbable or unfair in the light of relevant circumstances like exclusion of or absence of adequate provisions for the natural heirs without any reason. (iv) The dispositions may not appear to be the result of the testator’s free will and mind. (v) The propounder takes a prominent part in the execution of the will. (vi) The testator used to sign blank papers. (vii) The will did not see the light of the day for long. (viii) Incorrect recitals of essential facts.

[doc id=12825]

Previous Posts

Section 427 CrPC – Concurrent Running Of Sentences Shall Not Be Allowed In Drug Trafficking Cases: Supreme Court

Insurer Has Duty To Disclose Changed Policy Conditions During Renewal: Supreme Court Grants Mediclaim Relief To Senior Citizens

Non-Recovery Of Weapon Of Offence Would Not Impeach Prosecution Case Which Relies On Credible Direct Evidence: Supreme Court

Non-Disclosure Of Past & Present Litigations Concerning Dispute Amounts To Suppression Of Material Facts: Supreme Court

High Time That Civil Society Reacts Against Ghastly Crimes Committed In The Name Of Caste: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Of Accused In Honour Killing Case Download Judgement

Right Against Sexual Harassment Part Of Right To Life & Dignity Under Article 21: Supreme Court

Mechanical Compliance Of Stipulations U/Sec 63 Indian Succession Act Does Not Prove Execution Of Will: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act Attracted Even In Cases Where Debt Is Incurred After Cheque Is Drawn But Before Presentation: Supreme Court