Gautam Navlakha’s bail order for the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case, points out that there is no evidence indicating his involvement in a terrorist act: Bombay High Court

Gautam Navlakha’s bail order for the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case, points out that there is no evidence indicating his involvement in a terrorist act: Bombay High Court

Case: Gautam P. Navlakha vs. State of Maharashtra

Coram: Justices AS Gadkari and Shivkumar Dige 

Case No.: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 468 OF 2023

Court Observation: “The actual involvement of the appellant in any terrorist act cannot be even inferred from any of the communications and/ or statements of the witnesses,”

“Even though in the said documents, the authors of it have expressed their intention to cause fatality to the politically influential persons or to cause tremendous disturbance in the Society at large, the Appellant only being a member of the party cannot be prima facie held to be a co-conspirator to it. From the material on record, it appears to us that, no covert or overt terrorist act has been attributed to the Appellant.”

“It was at the most the intention of the Appellant to commit the alleged crime and not more than it. The said intention has not been further transformed into preparation or attempt to commit a terrorist act, to attract Section 15 of the UAP Act.”

Previous Posts

Efficient judicial functioning is jeopardized when parties are permitted to backtrack from their commitments without providing any justifiable reasons, as emphasized by the Delhi High Court

J&K High Court stresses that Section 37 of the NDPS Act must be interpreted in line with the fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21

Delhi High Court Orders Litigant Claiming Ownership of Territory Between Ganga and Yamuna from Agra to Gurugram to Pay ₹10,000 in Costs

Calcutta High Court states that arranging groups in the tender process with clear distinctions is acceptable; it shouldn’t be criticized just because it may not be convenient for all bidders

In cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the prosecution must independently prove the ‘Pendency of Official Favour,’ without relying on external support: AP High Court

Keywords

Gautam Navlakha’s bail order, Bombay High Court