Grave Misconduct: Rajasthan HC Imposes 1 Lac Cost On Advocate Who Filed Original Application Without Authorization, Superimposed Sign By Xerox Machine Etc.
Case: T.C. Gupta v. Union of India
Coram: Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Case No.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10645/2019
Court Observation: “Thus, the finding of the learned Tribunal that the petitioner, who has been enrolled as an Advocate post retirement from the Income Tax Department, has acted as de facto party in Judicial proceedings cannot be faulted. The Tribunal also noticed interpolations in the documents filed on record by the petitioner who personally verified the pleadings. Hence, the learned Tribunal was perfectly justified in imposing cost quantified at Rs.1,00,000/- upon the petitioner for such apparent misconduct.”
Previous Posts
Even If GOD Encroaches Upon Public Space, Will Order Its Removal: Madras High Court
Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses Download Judgement
S. 194-I Income Tax Act | TDS Cant Be Deducted In Absence Of Payment Of Rent: Orissa High Court
Keywords
Grave Misconduct, Application Without Authorization
