S.227 CrPC Accused Must Be Discharged In Absence Of Grave Suspicion: Orissa High Court

S.227 CrPC Accused Must Be Discharged In Absence Of Grave Suspicion

Case: Shantanu @ Priyabrata Senapati v. State of Orissa

Coram: Justice Sashikanta Mishra

Case No.: CRLREV No. 879 of 2014

Court Observation:“To further explain, suspicion per se may be entirely in the realm of speculation or imagination and may also be without any basis, whereas grave suspicion is something which arises on the basis of some acceptable material or evidence. Only because there is no other explanation for the alleged occurrence, the needle of suspicion should point at the accused cannot be a reasonable basis to proceed with the trial against him.”

Previous Posts

OROP Case: Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Can’t Be Invoked Based On Minister’s Statement & Parliamentary Committee Report – Supreme Court

FIR & Chargesheet Can Be Quashed If Allegations or Evidence Do Not Establish Commission of an Offence: Delhi High Court

Political Parties Not Bound To Establish Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act: Kerala High Court

Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages: Supreme Court

Investigation Was Anything But Scientific: Allahabad High Court Acquits Rape Murder Accused, Sets Aside Death Penalty

Supreme Court Dismisses Banks Application To Recall Judgment Which Directed RBI To Disclose Loan Defaulters List, Inspection Reports Under RTI Download Judgement