Interpretation Of Contract Primarily A Matter For Arbitrator To Determine, Scope Of Section 34 Arbitration Act Limited: Delhi High Court
Case: Raghunath Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Anant Raj Limited
Coram: Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna
Case No.: FAO (OS) (COMM) 220/2017
Court Observation: “…a change that has been brought in by the Amendment Act, 2015 is that the construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for an arbitrator to decide, unless the arbitrator construes the contract in a manner that no fair-minded or reasonable person would; in short that the arbitrator’s view is not even a possible view to take”
“The scope of grounds on which an Arbitral Award can be challenged under Section 34 of the Act is limited”. “…interpretation of a contract is a matter for the arbitrator to determine, even if it gives rise to determination of a question of law.”
Previous Posts
DISCOMS As State Bodies Duty Bound To Protect Consumers’ Interests: Rajasthan High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Against Non-Existent Entity Despite Active PAN
Related Articles
- Challenge Under Section 17 Of The SARFAESI Act Against Action Taken By Secured Creditor, Would Not Bar Arbitration Proceedings: Delhi High Court
- The escalating misuse of the RTI Act has resulted in a state of paralysis and instilled fear among government officials: Delhi High Court
- Delhi High Court Rules: Insolvency Resolution Professionals Are Not Deemed ‘Public Servants’ According to the Prevention of Corruption Act
