Madras High Court Hands Down 3-Year Jail Term to TN Minister Ponmudi in Disproportionate Asset Case

Case: State v K Ponmudi and Others

Coram: Justice G Jayachandran

Case No.: Crl A 53 of 2017

Court Observation: “This court, on considering the nature of offence and the gravity and impact on the society and also taking into consideration the submissions of the accused impose simple imprisonment of three years and fine of Rs. 50 Lakh each. In default, six months simple imprisonment. I’ll grant 30 days for surrender,”

“The principle to be followed by the appellate court considering the appeal against the judgment of acquittal is to interfere only when there are compelling and substantial reasons for doing so. If the impugned judgment is clearly unreasonable and if relevant and convincing materials have been unjustifiably eliminated in the process, it shall be a reason sufficient for interference,”

Previous Posts

In the Vivo Money Laundering Case, the Delhi High Court rejects the pleas of three accused claiming unlawful detention in jail without a judicial order

Patna High Court Grants Appeal Beyond Stipulated Time, Citing CBIC Notification

Sec 300 IPC: The Gujarat High Court asserts that even a single injury leading to the death of the victim can constitute ‘murder’

The Delhi High Court holds that Family Courts may extend the time for filing a written statement if exceptional circumstances are demonstrated

No Inherent Right to Continue: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Denies Relief to Contractual Doctor Seeking Service Extension Following the Closure of COVID Hospitals

Keywords

Madras High Court Hands Down 3-Year Jail Term

Related Articles

• Madras High Court Upholds Sentence Of Former Minister’s 80-Yr-Old Wife In Disproportionate Assets Case
• Section 245C(5) Of Income Tax Act Is Read Down By Removing Retrospective Last Date Of 1st Feb 21 As 31st March 21: Madras High Court
• Section 119 Evidence Act | Madras High Court Lays Down Principles For Examining Witnesses Who Are Unable To Speak