Maintenance Petition U/S 125 CrPC Covered By Res Judicata; Party Claiming Change In Circumstance Can’t File Fresh Plea But Move U/S 127 CrPC: Delhi HC

Maintenance Petition U/S 125 CrPC Covered By Res Judicata; Party Claiming Change In Circumstance Can’t File Fresh Plea But Move U/S 127 CrPC

Case: Sunita & Anr. V. Vijay Pal @ Mohd. Sabir & Anr.

Coram: Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma

Case No.: CRL.REV.P. 161/2018

Court Observation: “This Court notes that a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. will be covered by the principle of res judicata due to its universal applicability, as proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. are Quasi- Criminal in nature. Once the petition has been adjudicated under Section 125 Cr.P.C. favourably by a Court of competent jurisdiction on merits, a subsequent petition cannot be preferred which arises from the same dispute having similar situations, circumstances and grounds as the previously adjudicated issues in the earlier petition filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C.”

“The most important precondition for Section 125 Cr.P.C. to become operative is the condition that the wife is unable to maintain herself and that the husband has neglected or refused to maintain his wife,”

“Section 127 Cr.P.C. is not a stand-alone provision as the same requires a decision granting maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The term “change in circumstances” as referred to in Section 127(1) not only includes a change in the financial circumstances of the husband or wife but may also include other circumstantial changes in the husband’s or wife’s life which have arisen since the maintenance was first awarded”]

“The court must be satisfied that there has been a change in the circumstances of either the husband or of the wife, based upon which the fate of a petition under Section 127 Cr.P.C. shall be determined,”

Previous Posts

Appeals Against ITAT Order Will Lie Only Before The High Court Within Whose Jurisdiction The Assessing Officer Is Situated: Supreme Court

Contract Discharged By Settlement – Dispute Under Contract Is A Deadwood; Cannot Be Referred To Arbitration: Bombay High Court

Judges Can’t Overstep Defined Jurisdiction & Expose Administration Of Justice To Individualistic Whims & Fancies: J&K&L High Court

Disabled Employee Should Not Be Forced To Forfeit Seniority For Choosing Posting Place As Per Beneficial Circular: Supreme Court

Years Of Service Alone Does Not Entitle A Daily Wager To Regularization, Eligibility To The Post Paramount Consideration: J&K&L High Court

Preliminary Issues Are Determined Purely On Point Of Law In Isolation To Facts: Tripura High Court

Keywords

Maintenance Petition