Mandatory Notice Under Municipalities Act Waived in Title Declaration and Permanent Injunction Suit Against Town Municipal Council: Karnataka High Court

Case: Laxman Warad & Others AND Town Municipal Council

Coram: Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar

Case No.: Regular Second Appeal No 3206 of 2007

Case No.: “That itself establishes that the defendant has not invoked any of the provisions of The Karnataka Municipalities Act for removal of alleged encroachment made by the plaintiff over the property of the defendant. If any action is taken by the defendant under the provisions of The Karnataka Municipalities Act, then the defendant is entitled to prior notice as required under Section 284(1) of the Act.”

Previous Posts

The Delhi High Court asserts that the accuracy of information provided cannot be determined in proceedings under the RTI Act

If the accused simply avoids being found for a long time, it doesn’t automatically mean they are guilty: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court states that the prosecution should not be presumed guilty just because they choose not to present certain witnesses

IBC: If a case is heard on a specific date but the order is delivered later, the Supreme Court directs that the NCLT should not include the date of the hearing on the order

Lawyers must check case facts independently, even though they draft legal documents and argue based on client instructions: Supreme Court

Keywords

Mandatory Notice Under Municipalities Act, Karnataka High Court