Mofussil Pleadings Are To Be Considered As A Whole, Liberally & Must Be Construed Reasonably: Tripura High Court

Mofussil Pleadings Are To Be Considered As A Whole, Liberally & Must Be Construed Reasonably

Case: Sri Pratap Chandra Das v Smt. Hira Bala Das and ors

Coram: Justices Arindam Lodh and SG Chattopadhyay

Case No.: RFA 06 OF 2019

Court Observation: “I am in agreement with the view taken by the learned trial court as to how the court should read and construe the pleadings of the parties. It is settled law that mofussil pleadings are to be considered as a whole, liberally and must be construed reasonably.”

“Title to land cannot pass by admission when the statute requires a deed,”

“In case of conflict, without any sort of debate, the documentary evidence relating to a particular fact in issue that supports the pleadings of a party shall prevail over the pleadings based on such knowledge/information, or perception, etc. that run in contra to the contents of such documents/records.”

Previous Posts

No Recovery Can Be Made From Pension If Employee’s Promotion Was Not Based On Any Misrepresentation: J&K&L High Court

Sec 24(1) RFCTLARR Act- Land Acquisition Proceedings Get “Initiated” From Publication Of Sec 4(1) Notification Under 1894 Act: Supreme Court

Provisions Of Limitation Act Has No Application When A Statute Extinguishes The Right Itself: Supreme Court

Section 482 CrPC – High Court Can Recall Judgment/Order Which Was Passed Without Hearing A Person Prejudically Affected By It: Supreme Court

S.81(5) Motor Vehicle Act: Permit Renewed After Condoning Delay Is Deemed To Be Effective From Date Of Actual Expiry: Karnataka High Court

‘Matter Of Life & Death’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenge To Minimum Percentile Criteria For NEET-PG Admissions

Workman In Continuous Service For Years Without Any Break Can’t Be Denied Benefit U/S 25F ID Act Merely Because Of Contractual Engagement: Gujarat HC

Right To Property May No More Be A Fundamental Right, But Its Sanctity As Human Right Is Still Intact: J&K&L High Court

‘Wish/Desire Of Child’ Is Different From ‘Best Interest Of Child’: Supreme Court Allows A Father’s Plea Seeking Child Custody