Motor Accident Death | Kerala High Court Lays Down ‘Twin Conditions’ To Claim Compensation In Plea Alleging Driver’s Negligence

Motor Accident Death | Kerala High Court Lays Down ‘Twin Conditions’ To Claim Compensation In Plea Alleging Driver’s Negligence

Case: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. V. Babu & Ors.

Coram: Justice A. Badharudeen

Case No.: MACA NO. 350 OF 2012

Court Observation: “The prime question arises for consideration is what are the conditions to be established to claim compensation in a petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act when the petitioners allege negligence on the part of the driver/rider of the vehicle and death as its consequence? The answer to the above question is; twin conditions must be satisfied in this regard. The first one is proof of negligence on the part of the rider or driver of the vehicle alleged to be involved in the accident and the second one is proof of death of person in consequence of accidental injuries.”

“Thus it is the burden of the petitioners to adduce evidence to satisfy the allegation of negligence attributed against the driver or rider of the vehicle involved in the accident and to prove that the person died due to accidental injuries, since grant of compensation therein is based on the principle of `fault’ liability. It is the settled law that police charge/final report attributing negligence against the tortfeasor/ driver/ rider can be relied on to find negligence, if the contrary is not established otherwise, by means of positive evidence.”

Previous Posts

Order 41 Rule 31 CPC | First Appellate Court Ought To Consider Evidence On Record, In Particular Those Relied Upon By Trial Court: Supreme Court

Smartha Brahmins Not A Religious Denomination, Madras High Court

Kerala Municipality Rules | Pending Cases Not A Ground For Chairperson To Reject Request To Convene Municipality Meetings: High Court

Disclosing Elaborate Reasons For Passing ‘Interception Orders’ May Affect Intelligence: Delhi High Court

Victim May Seek Enhancement Of Accused’s Sentence By Filing Revision Application: Bombay High Court

Supplementary Chargesheet Must Disclose Novel Evidence, No Cognizance Where No New Material Discovered By Further Investigation: Delhi High Court

Once Substantive Provisions Of Part IXB Are Held Unconstitutional, Provisions On Multi-State Co-operative Societies Can’t Be Saved: Justice Joseph’s Dissent Download Judgement

Unauthorized Absence Cannot Amount To Automatic Cessation Of Service, Even If Delinquent Is A Probationer: J&K&L High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Shiv Sena MLA Latabai Sonawane’s Challenge To Invalidation Of Her Scheduled Tribe Certificate

Hate Speeches Delivered By Political & Religious Leaders Bulldoze Constitutional Ethos, Warrant Stringent Peremptory Action: Delhi High Court

No Need To File Separate Final Decree Proceedings In Partition Suit; Trial Courts Should Proceed Suo Motu Soon After Passing Preliminary Decree: Supreme Court