NEET-UG | Students Domiciled in Maharashtra but Passing 10th/ 12th Standard from Outside Not Eligible to Avail State Quota

Case: Rachna Sanjay Kuwar v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Coram: Justices S. V. Gangapurwala and S.G. Dige

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 2569 of 2022

Court Observation: “It is permissible to lay down the essential educational requirements, residential/domicile in a particular State in respect of basic courses of MBBS/BDS/Ayurvedic,”

“The Rule applicable since 2018 and followed consistently is that (i) the student should pass 10th and 12th standard from an institution situated within the State of Maharashtra and (ii) must be domicile of State of Maharashtra. Exception is if he has cleared 10th standard prior to the year 2017 from an institution outside the State of Maharashtra, he would still be eligible, provided he has passed 12th standard examination from an institution situated within the State of Maharashtra and he is also domicile of the Maharashtra,”

Previous Posts

Insurance Company Not Liable To Pay Compensation If Heavy Goods Vehicle Is Driven By Person Holding Light Motor Vehicle License: Karnataka High Court

Arbitral Fee under Fourth Schedule Based on Aggregate Value of Claim & Counter-Claim: Delhi High Court

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court

No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC

Appointment under Outstanding Sportsperson Quota Can Be Made Only When There Is ‘Direct Affiliation’ With Indian Olympic Association: Rajasthan HC

Private Doctors Submitting Sketchy Medical Reports To Courts Are Guilty Of Fabricating False Evidence Download Judgement

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Article 227 – High Court cannot go deep into Factual Issues like an Appellate Body: Supreme Court

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court

Keywords

NEET-UG, State Quota

Related Articles

• Candidates Born In Maharashtra But Completed 10th/ 12th From Outside Due To Parent’s Army Posting Entitled To State Quota In Admissions: High Court
• ‘Reached Moon But Caste Prejudices Remain’: Bombay High Court Quashes Maharashtra Policy Shielding State from Manual Scavenging Liability
• Arbitral Tribunal Not Barred Under Section 79 Of The RERA Act From Passing An Order Of Injunction: Bombay High Court