No Absolute Right Under RTE Act For Admission To Unaided Minority Schools

Case: Master Dhairya Pritesh Bansod .vs. The Principal, Mothers Pet Kindergarten, Nagpur and ors.

Coram: Justices Sunil Shukre and Justice GA Sanap

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 2118 Of 2021

Court Observation: “Such being the position, there would be no corresponding right vested in a student to seek admission to such a School and that it would be absolutely within the discretion and of the prerogative of the Private Minority Un-aided School,”

“There may be delay in communication of rejection of the application form by the School to the petitioner, but this delay in communication by itself would not create any right in the petitioner to seek admission to such a School.”

“We would have certainly considered the amendment application moved by the petitioner had there been any possibility of its bearing out any fruitful result,”

Previous Posts

S.138 NI Act | Gujarat High Court Sends Disputed Cheque To Handwriting Expert ‘In Larger Interest Of Fair Trial’

Societal Approval Of Intimate Personal Relations Not A Basis For Granting Them Recognition In Eyes Of Law: Patna High Court

Discussions About Working For Islam Not Incriminating: Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Man Accused Of IS Links After 7 Years Of Incarceration

Non-Compliance With S.279, 281 CrPC Only An Irregularity But That Is Not Permission To Violate It: Kerala High Court

Competent Authority Can’t Act Beyond Show Cause Notice: Gujarat High Court Cancels Forfeiture Of Land Allotted To Trust For Developing Playground

Courts Should Make Every Endeavour To Dispose A Case On Merits Rather Than On Default: Kerala High Court

Entity Which Misuses Status Under Section 12AA Income Tax Act Not Entitled To Retain It: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation Of Trust Registration Download Judgement

Keywords

No Absolute Right, RTE Act, Unaided Minority Schools