No Estoppel Against Statute: SC Upholds Cancellation Of Fair Price Shop Vacancies In West Bengal To Implement Food Security Act

Case: State of West Bengal vs Gitashree Dutta (Dey)

Coram: Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath

Case No.: CA 4254 OF 2022

Court Observation: “The respondent herein being a mere applicant in an un­finalised selection process, has no vested right in his favour to seek continuation of the notified vacancies, when by recalling the vacancy notification, the appellants endeavored to enforce the statute. Moreover, as discussed above, there can be no estoppel against a statute. Even going by the observations of the Division Bench in the impugned judgment, that the State was aware of the 2013 Act while issuing the 30.01.2014 vacancy notification, the said notification cannot be sustained, being contrary to the mandate of the National Food Security Act, 2013, more importantly of Section 12 thereof.”

Previous Posts

Review Committee Declared Guarantors As Wilful Defaulters Without Making Any Distinction Between Borrower And Guarantor: Kerala High Court

Honorable Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Would Warrant Quashing Of Criminal Prosecution Arising From Same Set Of Facts: Orissa High Court

Separate IGST On Indian Importers For Ocean Freight Against Concept Of “Composite Supply”, Violates Section 8 CGST Act: Supreme Court

Hindu Succession Act – HUF Property Is Presumed For Be For Widow’s Maintenance When She Has Its Settled & Exclusive Possession: Supreme Court

Continuing Unlawful Activity For Gaining Advantages Other Than Economic Or Pecuniary Is Also An “Organised Crime” Under MCOCA: Supreme Court

Arbitration Reference Not Maintainable If Filed After Admission Of Insolvency Resolution Petition U/s 7 IBC Download Judgement

Company Tribunal Not A Labour Court Or Administrative Tribunal To Focus Entirely On Removal Of Director: Supreme Court In Tata-Mistry Case

Second Appeal: Judgment Should Not Be Interfered With By High Court Unless There Is A Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates Supreme Court

Proclaimed Offender Declaration Under Section 82(4) CrPC Cannot Be Made Against Person Accused Of Sections 406, 420 IPC

Related Articles

• The Supreme Court asserts that in cases of inconsistency, the Food Safety and Standards Act will take precedence over the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act
• Provisions Of Limitation Act Has No Application When A Statute Extinguishes The Right Itself: Supreme Court
• “No Repugnancy With Central Act”: Supreme Court Upholds Sections 4(7),4(8) & 15 Of Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976