Order XXII Rule 4 CPC – Appeal As A Whole Does Not Abate Merely Because LRs Of Some Deceased Respondents Were Not Brought On Record

Case: Delhi Development Authority vs Diwan Chand Anand

Coram: Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna

Case No.: CA 2397 of 2022

Court Observation: “While considering whether the suit/appeal has abated due to non­bringing the legal representatives of plaintiffs/defendants or not, the Court has to examine if the right to sue survives against the surviving respondents. Thereafter the Appellate Court has to consider the question whether non­bringing the legal representatives of some of the defendants, the appeal could have proceeded against the surviving respondents. Therefore, the Appellate Court has to consider the effect of abatement of the appeal against each of the respondents in case of multiple respondents.”

Previous Posts

Drugs & Cosmetics Act: Complainant Must Prove “Exclusive Possession” Of Premises By Accused From Where Recovery Is Made: Telangana High Court

Licence Under Places Of Public Resort Act Is Compulsory To Run A Gym: Kerala High Court

Hindu Marriage Act: Able-Bodied Husband Having Earning Capacity Can’t Seek Permanent Alimony From Wife: Karnataka High Court

Only God Can Save These Types Of Lawyers: Kerala High Court After Advocate Argues Against Interest Of His Client

Employment Conditions Can’t Take Away Employees’ Right To Seek Judicial Review Of Employer’s Actions: J&K&L High Court

Section 8 Application Should Be Filed Within Time Available For Filing Written Statement: Delhi High Court

Married Woman Wilfully Cohabitating With Another Man Can’t Prosecute Him For Rape Under False Promise Of Marriage: Telangana High Court

S.354 IPC Not Attracted If Woman Herself Didn’t Perceive The Act Of ‘Catching Hold Of Her Hand’ As Invading Her Decency: Telangana High Court

Pre-Condition Of Filing Complaint U/S 138 NI Act Not Fulfilled When Statutory Notice Of Demand Sent On Wrong Address: J&K&L High Court

Person Who Secures Appointment On The Basis Of A False Caste Certificate Cannot Be Permitted To Retain Benefit Of Wrongful Appointment: Supreme Court

Appeal Against Environmental Clearance Granted to Vishakapatnam Greenfield International Airport Restored By Supreme Court Before NGT Download Judgement

Keywords

Order XXII Rule 4 CPC, Deceased Respondents

Related Articles

• Legality Of Order Setting Defendant Ex Parte Can Be Challenged In Appeal Even Without Filing Application Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC: Supreme Court
• Order 41 Rule 31 CPC | First Appellate Court Ought To Consider Evidence On Record, In Particular Those Relied Upon By Trial Court: Supreme Court
• Will Can’t Be Presumed To Be Valid Merely Because It Is Registered: Supreme Court