Political Parties Not Bound To Establish Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act: Kerala High Court

Political Parties Not Bound To Establish Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act

Case: Centre for Constitutional Rights Research and Advocacy v. State of Kerala & Ors.

Coram: Chief Justice S. Manikumar and Justice Shaji P. Chaly

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 36059 OF 2018

Court Observation: “..we find that the political parties, which are not having any employer-employee relationship with its members and which are not carrying on with any private venture, undertaking, enterprises, institution, establishment etc. in contemplation of a ‘workplace’ as defined under section 2(o)(ii) of Act, 2013, are not liable to make any Internal Complaints Committee.”

“This would be more clear, if we analyse the definition of employer contained under section 2(g)(ii). Section 2(g)(i) in fact deals with the department, organisation, undertaking, establishment etc. of the appropriate Government or a local authority, head of that department, an organisation etc. So that clause 2(g) (i) would not come into play so far as the contentions advanced in the writ petitions are concerned against the respondents in the writ petition because there is no case for the petitioners that any of the organisations and the political parties would come under the term “appropriate Government” or “local body” so as to persuade such organisations to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee.”

Previous Posts

Section 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court

Section 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement: Supreme Court

No Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension: Supreme Court Upholds Centre’s OROP Policy In Defence Forces

Passport Cannot Be Denied To Child on Sole Ground That One Parent Is Non-Indian Citizen: Kerala High Court

Armed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226: Delhi HC

Rusk Is Different from Bread, VAT Exemption Available To Bread Can’t Be Extended To Rusk: Meghalaya High Court

Rubbing Male Organ on Vagina or Urethra over Victim’s Underpants Amounts to Rape: Meghalaya High Court

Second Appeal: Judgment Should Not Be Interfered With By High Court Unless There Is A Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates Supreme Court Download Judgement

Keywords

POSH Act, Complaints Committee