PC Act – Mere Acceptance of Amount, Without Proof of Bribe Demand, Will Not Establish Offence under Section 7

Case: K. Shanthamma vs State of Telangana

Corum: Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka

Case No.: CrA 261 OF 2022

Court Observation: “The offence under Section 7 of the PC Act relating to public servants taking bribe requires a demand of illegal gratification and the acceptance thereof. The proof of demand of bribe by a public servant and its acceptance by him is sine quo non for establishing the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act.” “The proof of demand of illegal gratification, thus, is the gravamen of the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act and in absence thereof, unmistakably the charge therefor, would fail. Mere acceptance of any amount allegedly by way of illegal gratification or recovery thereof, dehors the proof of demand, ipso facto, would thus not be sufficient to bring home the charge under these two sections of the Act. As a corollary, failure of the prosecution to prove the demand for illegal gratification would be fatal and mere recovery of the amount from the person accused of the offence under Section 7 or 13 of the Act would not entail his conviction thereunder.”

Previous Posts

Superannuation Does Not Absolve Employee From Misconduct; Bank Employee Always Holds Position Of Trust: Supreme Court

Specific Relief Act – Compensation In Lieu Of Specific Performance Can’t Be Granted Unless Specifically Claimed In Plaint: Supreme Court

Quasi-Judicial Authority Has To Disclose Material That Has Been Relied Upon At The Stage Of Adjudication: Supreme Court

Order II Rule 3 CPC Does Not Compel A Plaintiff To Join Two Or More Causes Of Action In A Single Suit: Supreme Court

Suo Motu Limitation Extension Orders Applicable To Filing Of Written Statements In Commercial Suits: Supreme Court

Motor Accident Compensation – Self-Employed Deceased Aged Below 40 Years Entitled To 40% Addition As Future Prospects: Supreme Court Download Judgement