Bombay High Court Quashes ED Order Imposing 25Cr Penalty On Sterlite Industries & Its Directors Over Alleged Violation Of Forex Rules

Bombay High Court Quashes ED Order Imposing 25Cr Penalty On Sterlite Industries & Its Directors Over Alleged Violation Of Forex Rules

Case: Sterlite Industries (lndia ) Limited and ors v Special Director of Enforcement and ors

Coram: Justices KR Shriram and Milind Jadhav

Case No.: Writ Petition No.337 Of 2009

Court Observation: “Passing of the adjudication order after the offence has been compounded, is thus contrary to the statutory provisions discussed hereinabove, is not maintainable and thus without jurisdiction.”

“The Reserve Bank of India in turn has issued certificates to petitioners acknowledging the payment made by petitioners in respect of the each of the compounding order (five in all) and issued five such separate certificates, all dated 06.02.2009, certifying that petitioners have paid the compounding charges in compliance of the compounding orders passed by the Compounding Authority under section 15 of the said Act read with the said Rules,”

“In these circumstances, we cannot hold petitioners responsible for contravention once the compounding orders have been passed. We have noted that there is a gap of “one day” between the passing of the two sets of orders, i.e., compounding orders and adjudicating order. Be that as it may, petitioners cannot be faulted and held liable for contravention once the compounding orders are passed by the Compounding Authority. That is the mandate of the statute.”

Previous Posts

Failure To File Income Tax Return: Prosecution U/S 276CC IT Act Not Permissible Without Previous Sanction Of Appropriate Authority: Delhi High Court

Court While Deciding ‘Section 11’ Application Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator Can Consider Whether Dispute Falls Within ‘Excepted Clause’: Supreme Court

S.125 CrPC: Parties Often Don’t Disclose Their Actual Income, Maintenance May Be Granted Considering Their Status & Lifestyle: Delhi High Court

If Number Of Qualified Applicants Disproportionately Exceed Vacancies, Selection Committee May Shortlist Candidates Based On Rational Criteria: Kerala HC

UAPA: Only Special Court/Session Court Empowered To Decide Bail Applications, Judicial Magistrate Has No Jurisdiction: J&K&L High Court

Minor Girl Living With Accused As His Wife: Meghalaya High Court Quashes POCSO Case Adopting A ‘Pragmatic’ Approach

Dowry Death: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Conviction U/S 304B IPC Citing Discrepancies In Multiple Dying Declarations

Madras High Court Releases On Probation Mother Who Killed Her Two Daughters Due To Societal Taunts About Bearing Only Female Children

States Have No Power To Identify Socially & Educationally Backward Classes After 102nd Constitution Amendment: Supreme Court Holds By 3:2 Majority Download Judgement

Keywords

Quashes ED Order, Violation Of Forex Rules