Article 226 – High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts
Case: State of Gujarat vs R.J. Pathan
Coram: Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna
Case No.: CA 1951 OF 2022
Court Observation: “Such a direction to create supernumerary posts is unsustainable. Such a direction is wholly without jurisdiction”
“The High Court has observed that even while absorbing and/or regularising the services of the respondents, the State Government may create supernumerary posts. Such a direction to create supernumerary posts is unsustainable. Such a direction is wholly without jurisdiction. No such direction can be issued by the High Court for absorption/regularisation of the employees who were appointed in a temporary unit which was created for a particular project and that too, by creating supernumerary posts.”
The purpose and intent of the decision in Umadevi (supra) was, (1) to prevent irregular or illegal appointments in the future, and (2) to confer a benefit on those who had been irregularly appointed in the past and who have continued for a very long time. The decision of Umadevi (supra) may be applicable in a case where the appointments are irregular on the sanctioned posts in regular establishment. The same does not apply to temporary appointments made in a project/programme.
“Even such a direction could not have been passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as there were no peculiar facts and circumstances which warranted the above observation. No such order of absorption and/or regularisation even if required for creating supernumerary posts and not to treat the same as precedent could have been passed by the High Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.”
Previous Posts
CPC – Application To Amend Admissions Can Be Entertained Even After Judgment Is Reserved Under Order XII Rule 6: Delhi High Court Download Judgement
