Resolution Process Has To Be Completed Within The Period Stipulated U/Sec 12 IBC: Supreme Court

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Resolution Process Has To Be Completed Within The Period Stipulated U/Sec 12 IBC

Case: Committee of Creditors of Amtek Auto Limited through Corporation Bank vs Dinkar T. Venkatsubramanian

Coram: Justices MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna

Case No.: CA 6707 OF 2019

Court Observation: “The approved resolution plan has to be implemented at the earliest and that is the mandate under the IBC. As per Section 12 of the IBC, subject to sub-section (2), the corporate insolvency resolution process shall be completed within a period of 180 days from the date of admission of the application to initiate such process, which can be extended by a further period of 180 days. As per proviso to Section 12 of the IBC, which has been inserted by Act 26 of 2019, the insolvency resolution process shall mandatorily be completed within a period of 330 days from the insolvency commencement date, including any extension of the period of corporate insolvency resolution process granted under Section 12 of the IBC and the time taken in legal proceedings in relation 12 to such resolution process of the Corporate Debtor. As per the third proviso to Section 12 of the IBC, which is also inserted by Act 26 of 2019, where the insolvency resolution process of a Corporate Debtor is pending and has not been completed within a period stated hereinabove, i.e., within a period of 330 days, such resolution process shall be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of commencement of the IBC amendment Act, 2019, i.e., 16.08.2019. Thus, the entire resolution process has to be completed within the period stipulated under Section 12 of the IBC and any deviation would defeat the object and purpose of providing such time limit.”

“Any further delay in implementation of the approved resolution plan submitted by DVI which as such has been approved by the adjudicating authority in the month of July, 2020 and even the appeal against the same has been dismissed subsequently, any further delay would defeat the very object and purpose of providing specific time limit for completion of the insolvency resolution process, as mandated under Section 12 of the IBC.”

[doc id=12392]

Previous Posts

Pension Shall Be Determined On Rules Existing At The Time Of Retirement: Supreme Court

Death Penalty – Court Duty Bound To Consider Possibility Of Reformation Even If Accused Remains Silent: Supreme Court

Rape Conviction Can Be Based On Sole Testimony Of Victim If Credible & Trustworthy, Reiterates Supreme Court

Mere Allegation Of Fraud Without Particulars Not Sufficient To Get Over Bar On Civil Suit Under Section 34 SARFAESI: Supreme Court

Father Responsible To Maintain Child Till Adulthood: Supreme Court Download Judgement