Delhi High Court Restores Bail In View Of Disputed Fact About Accused Threatening Complainant

Case: Jagat Singh Nagar & Ors V. State & Ors

Coram: Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2110 Of 2014

Court Observation: “It is thus, seen that occurrence of supervening circumstances can always be the basis for cancellation of bail granted earlier besides, the inherent powers and discretion to cancel the bail of an accused on merits. Cancellation of bail after it is granted because the accused has misconducted or because of some supervening circumstances, warranting such cancellation, is in a different compartment altogether than an order granting bail, which is unjustified, illegal and perverse,”

“This court is not oblivious of the fact that there is an FIR and a counter FIR with respect to incident dated 01.03.2014. The truth of the allegations and counter allegations has not yet surfaced. The parties are relatives,”

Previous Posts

Presumption U/S 113-B Evidence Act Not Attracted If Incident Of Cruelty Has Become So Stale To Not Disturb Mental Equilibrium Of Woman: MP High Court

Temporary Official Appointed On Daily Rated Or Work Charge Basis To Do Specific Job Cannot Claim Seniority For Such Service Period: Delhi High Court

J&K Migrant Immovable Property Act | Only District Magistrate Has Authority To Hold Enquiry Into Alienation Made In Contravention Of Act: High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Validity Of Centre’s 2013 Notification For Compounding Offences Before Institution Of Prosecution Under FCRA

Non-Filing Of Legal Proceedings Certificate Does Not Disentitle Party To File Suit Seeking Injunction In Apprehension Of Trademark Infringement: Delhi High Court

Keywords

Restores Bail, Accused Threatening Complainant