Delhi High Court Restores Bail In View Of Disputed Fact About Accused Threatening Complainant
Case: Jagat Singh Nagar & Ors V. State & Ors
Coram: Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2110 Of 2014
Court Observation: “It is thus, seen that occurrence of supervening circumstances can always be the basis for cancellation of bail granted earlier besides, the inherent powers and discretion to cancel the bail of an accused on merits. Cancellation of bail after it is granted because the accused has misconducted or because of some supervening circumstances, warranting such cancellation, is in a different compartment altogether than an order granting bail, which is unjustified, illegal and perverse,”
“This court is not oblivious of the fact that there is an FIR and a counter FIR with respect to incident dated 01.03.2014. The truth of the allegations and counter allegations has not yet surfaced. The parties are relatives,”
Previous Posts
Keywords
Restores Bail, Accused Threatening Complainant
Related Articles
- Delhi Riots: High Court Denies Bail To Accused As Prosecution Accuses Him Of Threatening Witnesses
- Sukesh Chandrashekhar Extortion Case: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To 69-Yr-Old Accused In MCOCA, PMLA Cases
- “Alleged Offence Grave But Trial Would Take Ample Time”: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Three Officials Accused In Biocon Bribery Case

