RTI Act | Penalty Imposed On Public Information Officers For Delay In Reply Depends On ‘Malice’: Delhi High Court
Case: POOJA V . SHAH v. BANK OF INDIA & Other Connected Matter
Coram: Justice Subramonium Prasad
Case No.: W.P.(C) 2398/2021
Court Observation: “What is mandatory is the imposition of penalty and not the quantum of penalty. The RTI Act only specifies the maximum limit of the penalty and not the minimum limit. It is nowhere mentioned that delay of each day will incur a penalty of Rs.250/-,”
“Since the degree of the penalty will depend and differ upon the knowledge of the Public Information Officer and the reasons as to why the Public Information Officer could not furnish the relevant information the submission of the Petitioner that it is mandatory to impose a penalty of Rs.250/- per day on the Public Information Officers for not furnishing the relevant information cannot be accepted,”
“This Court is also of the opinion that adequate punishment has been given to the CPIOs who have now been made to pay the amount of penalty from their salary. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are dismissed.”
Previous Posts
Keywords
RTI Act, Penalty Imposed On Public Information Officers, Delhi High Court, Depends On ‘Malice’
Related Articles
- The Delhi High Court asserts that the accuracy of information provided cannot be determined in proceedings under the RTI Act
- Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC
- The escalating misuse of the RTI Act has resulted in a state of paralysis and instilled fear among government officials: Delhi High Court
