S.65 Mohammedan Law | First Cousin Brother On Mother’s Side Not Entitled To Share In Deceased Uncle’s Property

Case: Husainsab V. Modinabi @ Fakrubi

Coram: Justice H.P. Sandesh

Case No.: R.F.A.No.1979/2005

Court Observation: It is clear that defendants’ father is not real brother of the plaintiff’s father but only admitted relationship is that the plaintiff and defendants are cousins since the plaintiff’s mother and defendants’ mother are sisters and hence the very contention of the plaintiff’s counsel that the defendants come within Section 65 of the Mohammedan Law cannot be accepted and they cannot claim as residuaries.

“The evidence varies with regard to the date, writing of the Wills…merely because the documents are registered, the Court cannot come to the conclusion that the same is executed by Alisab.”

Previous Posts

Financial Criteria In A Compassionate Appointment Scheme Cannot Be Ignored: Supreme Court

Person Not Appearing & Pleading Before Courts Not An “Advocate”, Mere Enrollment With Bar Council Is Of No Consequence: Gujarat High Court

Merely Because Some Benefit Accrued To Litigant Due To Interim Order, They Cannot Claim Such Benefits When Litigation Ends Against Them: Gujarat HC

UGC Regulations 2016 Exempting PhD Holders From NET Qualification Will Apply Retrospectively: Supreme Court

Appeals Against ITAT Order Will Lie Only Before The High Court Within Whose Jurisdiction The Assessing Officer Is Situated: Supreme Court

Keywords

S.65 Mohammedan Law,

Related Articles

• A promissory note giving the payer the right to recover as per the law doesn’t affect the unconditional commitment: Karnataka HC
• Tenant can bequeath the suit property through a will even before the grant of occupancy rights. The beneficiary mentioned in the will becomes the absolute owner: Karnataka High Court
• Family Pension Not Payable To Second-Wife When First Marriage Subsists: Karnataka High Court