Section 8 Application Should Be Filed Within Time Available For Filing Written Statement: Delhi High Court

Section 8 Application Should Be Filed Within Time Available For Filing Written Statement

Case: MS. SPML Infra Ltd. versus MS. Trisquare Switchgears Pvt. Ltd.

Coram: Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Amit Mahajan

Case No.: FAO(COMM) 81/2022

Court Observation: “It is clear from the scheme of the Act that once the proceedings before the court or judicial authority progress beyond the initial stage, it would no longer be permissible for a party to then turn around and seek recourse to arbitration. A mere delay in making an application under Section 8 of the A&C Act may not be fatal to a party’s right; but once the proceedings have progressed beyond the stage of completion of pleadings, such an application would not lie. This is because at that stage, the parties are sufficiently invested in the said proceedings, and it would not be permissible for any party to turn around and apply under Section 8 of the A&C Act.”

“The introduction of the expression “the date of” in the context of the suit would necessarily have to be co-related with the time available or granted for filing of a written statement. The legislative intent of introducing the expression “the date of”, when read with the contemporaneous amendments to Order VIII Rule 1 of the CPC by virtue of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, is quite clear; it is to introduce the precise time frame within which an application under Section 8(1) of the A&C Act could be filed.”

Previous Posts

Suspension Period Cannot Be Treated ‘Wholly Unjustified’ In Case Of Partial Exoneration: Gujarat High Court

Patents Act: Non-Consideration Of Grounds In Rejecting Pre-Grant Opposition Constitutes Violation Of Principles Of Natural Justice: Delhi High Court

Payment Of Gratuity Act: Teachers Come Within The Preview of Employee U/S 2(e): Kerala High Court

Reopening of IT Assessment By Officer Having No Jurisdiction: Madras High Court Invalidates Proceedings

Repeated Sexual Activity With 9 Yr Old Child Not Possible Sans Any Injury In Vaginal/ Genital Area: JKL HC Sets Aside Rape Conviction

Gujarat Mining Rules | Locking Of Online ATR Account / Suspension Of Transit Permit Must Be Supported By Reasons In Writing: High Court

[Order VII Rule 11 CPC] Quantum Of Damages Can Only Be Decided After Trial, Not Ground To Reject Plaint: Delhi High Court

Employee Can’t Claim Equal Pay Due To Mere Similarity Of Designation Or Similarity Of Quantum Of Work: Supreme Court

Second Appeal: Judgment Should Not Be Interfered With By High Court Unless There Is A Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates Supreme Court Download Judgement

Pension Scheme Can Be Claimed From Date Of Entering Into Service, Not Date Of Approval Of Regular Appointment: Madras High Court

High Court Cannot Control Day To Day Affairs Of Trial Court In Exercise Of Its Reversional Power: Delhi High Court