State Does Not Have Unlimited Resources, Institutions That Waive Arrears To Seek Grant-In-Aid Can’t Be Permitted To Take U-Turn

Case: Dr. Baldev Prasad Chamoli and Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others

Coram: Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe

Case No.: Writ Petition (S/B) No.510 of 2022

Court Observation: “The State is not having unlimited resources. The State took a conscious decision to sanction the grant-in-aid to the Institution in question on the clear understanding as contained in Clause 3 of the said communication. The petitioners now seek to disturb the appropriate part after 16 years. Grant of relief to the petitioners at this stage would derail the resources and finances of the State which they had never bargained for.”

Previous Posts

Over 10 Yrs After Acquittal By Trial Court, Delhi HC Convicts Man For Raping 11-Yr-Old; Sentences To 10 Yrs Rigorous Imprisonment

CPC | ‘Suit & Counterclaim Are Treated As Unified Proceedings Which Can Form Basis Of Filing Appeal’: Gujarat High Court

[MPSC Exam] Judicial Intervention In Result Even At Interim Stage Of Proceedings Affects All Candidates: Bombay High Court

[MP Mohan Delkar Suicide] Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment FIR Against Dadra & Nagar Haveli Administrator & 8 Others

Legal Heirs Can Substitute Complainant In Complaint Cases & Pursue Prosecution Upon His Death: Orissa High Court

Res Judicata Not Attracted In Subsequent Suit Between Same Parties Seeking Completely Different Remedies Qua Same Property: Chhattisgarh HC

Keywords

State Does Not Have Unlimited Resources, Waive Arrears, Can’t Be Permitted To Take U-Turn