Suo Motu Limitation Extension Orders Applicable To Filing Of Written Statements In Commercial Suits: Supreme Court

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:5 mins read

Suo Motu Limitation Extension Orders Applicable To Filing Of Written Statements In Commercial Suits

Case: Prakash Corporates vs Dee Vee Projects Limited

Coram: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath

Case No.: CA 1318 of 2022

Court Observation: “The period envisaged finally in the order dated 23.09.2021 is required to be excluded in computing the period of limitation even for filing the written statement and even in cases where the delay is otherwise not condonable”

Tersely put, as per the mandate of the said provisions: (a) the defendant is under an obligation to file the written statement of his defence within 30 days of service of summons; (b) if he fails to file the written statement within the said period of 30 days, he may be allowed to file the written statement on such other day as the Court may specify for reasons to be recorded in writing and on payment of such costs as the Court may impose but this other day, in any case, cannot go beyond 120 days from the date of service of summons; (c) on expiry of 120th day from the date of service of summons, the defendant forfeits the right to file the written statement and no Court can make an order to 32 extend such time beyond 120 days from the date of service of summons.

“Having regard to the purpose for which this Court had exercised the plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and issued necessary orders from time to time in SMWP No. 3 of 2020, we are clearly of the view that the period envisaged finally in the order dated 23.09.2021 is required to be excluded in computing the period of limitation even for filing the written statement and even in cases where the delay is otherwise not condonable. It gets perforce reiterated that the orders in SMWP No. 3 of 2020 were of extraordinary measures in extraordinary circumstances and their operation cannot be curtailed with reference to the ordinary operation of law.”

“In other words, the orders passed by this Court on 23.03.2020, 06.05.2020, 10.07.2020, 27.04.2021 and 23.09.2021 in SMWP No. 3 of 2020 leave nothing to doubt that special and extraordinary measures were provided by this Court for advancing the cause of justice in the wake of challenges thrown by the pandemic; and their applicability cannot be denied in relation to the period prescribed for filing the written statement. It would be unrealistic and illogical to assume that while this Court has provided for exclusion of period for institution of the suit and therefore, a suit otherwise filed beyond limitation (if the limitation had expired between 15.03.2020 to 02.10.2021) could still be filed within 90 days from 03.10.2021 but the period for filing written statement, if expired during that period, has to operate against the defendant.”

Previous posts

Section 482 CrPC – There Has To Be Some Factual Supporting Material For FIR Allegations: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

Affidavits Not Mere Sheets of Paper but Solemn Statements on Oath: Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of NOIDA Plot Allotment

Intelligible Differentia: Supreme Court Upholds State Policy To Deny Bonus Marks To NRHM/NHM Employees In Other States

Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Injurious Affection To Property May Stand On A Different Footing From Injurious Affection To Earnings: Supreme Court

Transfer Order Unsustainable If It Is Based On Irrelevant Ground & Not On Any Germane Factor: Supreme Court

Penetrative Sexual Act Between The Thighs Of Victim Held Together Is Rape As Defined U/S 375 IPC: Kerala High Court Download Judgement

Keywords

Suo Motu Limitation Extension, Written Statements