Suspension Of Para Swimmer Prasanta Karmakar Accused Of Recording Videos Of Female Swimmers Upheld By Delhi High Court
Case: Prasanta Karmakar v. Paralympic Committee of India through its Chariman & Ors.
Coram: Justice Subramonium Prasad
Case No.: W.P.(C) 6923/2020
Court Observation: “It is well settled that when a statute/law/bye-law gives a discretion to an administration to take a decision, the scope of judicial review remains limited and it is not permissible, unless the decision is contrary to law or has been taken without considering the relevant factors or where irrelevant factors have been considered or the decision is one which a prudent man would not have arrived at.”
“It is well settled that when a statute/law/bye-law gives a discretion to an administration to take a decision, the scope of judicial review remains limited and it is not permissible, unless the decision is contrary to law or has been taken without considering the relevant factors or where irrelevant factors have been considered or the decision is one which a prudent man would not have arrived at.”
Previous Posts
Maintenance Provision Under Hindu Marriage Act Is Gender Neutral: Delhi High Court
Keywords
Suspension Of Para Swimmer Prasanta Karmakar Accused Of Recording Videos Of Female Swimmers, Delhi High Court
Related Articles
- The accused cannot be deprived of the right to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) solely on the basis of unsatisfactory jail conduct: Delhi High Court
- In the Vivo Money Laundering Case, the Delhi High Court rejects the pleas of three accused claiming unlawful detention in jail without a judicial order
- Sukesh Chandrashekhar Extortion Case: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To 69-Yr-Old Accused In MCOCA, PMLA Cases
