Suspension Of Sentence U/S 389 CrPC Need Not Be Considered In Heinous Cases Unless Appeal Remains Undecided For 5/6 Years
Case: Javid Ahmad Shah Vs UT of J&K
Coram: Justices Ali Mohammad Magrey and MD Akram Chowdhary
Case No.: CrlA(D) No. 22/2022
Court Observation: “There is a distinction between bail and suspension of sentence. One of the essential ingredients of Section 389 is the requirement for the appellant court to record reasons in writing for ordering suspension of execution of the sentence or order appealed. The requirement of recording reasons in writing clearly indicates that there has to be careful consideration of the relevant aspects and the order directing suspension of sentence and grant of bail should not be passed as a matter of routine”
Previous Posts
Lodging Juveniles In Adult Prisons Amounts To Deprivation Of Their Personal Liberty: Supreme Court
Related Articles
- Sec 125 CrPC | Muslim Husband Cannot Avoid His Liability To Maintain Unless Divorce Is Validly Pronounced And Properly Communicated: J&K&L High Court
- S.311 CrPC Asserts Power Of Courts To Recall & Summon Witnesses Even After Closure Of Evidence In Criminal Proceedings: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
- Order XLI Rule 3-A CPC | Failure To File Appeal With Application For Condonation Of Delay Curable Defect, Can Be Filed Subsequently: J&K&L High Court

