Skip to content
The Law Communicants_Logo
  • About Us
    • Our Legal Experts
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editorial Board
    • Campus Ambassador
    • Our Partners
  • Services
    • Legal Advice
    • Mentorship
    • Book Appointment
    • Submit Your Post
  • Daily Judgments
    • Supreme Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Odisha High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Events
    • Seminar & Webinars
    • Call for Paper
    • Moot Courts & Debates
    • Call for Chapters
    • Call for Blogs
    • Courses
  • Journal
  • Videos
  • Study Material
    • Books
    • Blog
    • Bare Act
  • Contact Us
  • Toggle website search
Search this website
Menu Close
  • About Us
    • Our Legal Experts
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editorial Board
    • Campus Ambassador
    • Our Partners
  • Services
    • Legal Advice
    • Mentorship
    • Book Appointment
    • Submit Your Post
  • Daily Judgments
    • Supreme Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Odisha High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Events
    • Seminar & Webinars
    • Call for Paper
    • Moot Courts & Debates
    • Call for Chapters
    • Call for Blogs
    • Courses
  • Journal
  • Videos
  • Study Material
    • Books
    • Blog
    • Bare Act
  • Contact Us
  • Toggle website search
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
The-drawer's-consent-is-not-necessary-for-alterations-to-the-body-of-a-blank-signed-cheque-but-such-alterations-should-not-exceed-the-amount-originally-covered-by-it-Karnataka-High-Court-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

The drawer’s consent is not necessary for alterations to the body of a blank signed cheque, but such alterations should not exceed the amount originally covered by it: Karnataka High Court

  • Post published:January 4, 2024
  • Post category:Daily Judgments/Karnataka High Court

The drawer's consent is not necessary for alterations to the body of a blank signed cheque, but such alterations should not exceed the amount originally…

Continue ReadingThe drawer’s consent is not necessary for alterations to the body of a blank signed cheque, but such alterations should not exceed the amount originally covered by it: Karnataka High Court

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court invokes Manusmriti, upholds widowed daughter-in-law’s maintenance rights from father-in-law’s estate under HAMA
  • Supreme Court’s split verdict on Section 17A PCA: Tension between protecting honest officers and pursuing the corrupt
  • Job Opportunity: Young Professional At Income Tax Department, Chandigarh
  • Job Opportunity: Consultant At Ministry Of External Affairs, New Delhi
  • Job Opportunity: Manager (HR) At Odisha State Cooperative Milk Producers’ Federation
  • Job Opportunity: Para Legal Volunteers At District Legal Services Authority, Darrang

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



Top Trending Posts

  • Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Regulatory Gaps: Addressing the Legal Challenges of Unregulated Financial Ecosystems
  • PoSH 2025 compliance: ICC setup, investigation timelines, confidentiality risks, and annual report filing guide
  • NLIU-CRIL Journal of International Law and Policy
  • Nature of Administrative Tribunals: Constitution, Powers, Procedures, and Rules of Evidence
  • The Champakam Dorairajan Case: A Landmark in Indian Constitutional Law

Contact Info

  • Address:53A 2nd Floor Main Road, Pandav Nagar Delhi 110092
  • Email:contact@thelawcommunicants.comOpens in your application

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Recent Post

  • Supreme Court invokes Manusmriti, upholds widowed daughter-in-law’s maintenance rights from father-in-law’s estate under HAMA
  • Supreme Court’s split verdict on Section 17A PCA: Tension between protecting honest officers and pursuing the corrupt
  • Job Opportunity: Young Professional At Income Tax Department, Chandigarh

Website Stats

  • 652,618 Monthly Visitors
  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
© 2025 | All Rights Reserved | The Law Communicants |

Hey, wait!

Don't forget to subscribe to our newsletter for weekly updates about our events, blogs and various opportunities. 

Enter your email address

Thanks, I’m not interested