Can't Interfere With Discretionary Order Condoning Delay In Supervisory Jurisdiction U/Art 227 Unless There Is Total Non-Application Of Mind: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Can’t Interfere With Discretionary Order Condoning Delay In Supervisory Jurisdiction U/Art 227 Unless There Is Total Non-Application Of Mind: Delhi HC

Can't Interfere With Discretionary Order Condoning Delay In Supervisory Jurisdiction U/Art 227 Unless There Is Total Non-Application Of Mind Case: Madan Lal Suryawanshi v. Tara…

Continue ReadingCan’t Interfere With Discretionary Order Condoning Delay In Supervisory Jurisdiction U/Art 227 Unless There Is Total Non-Application Of Mind: Delhi HC
High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Orders Passed Under Order 39 Rules 1&2 Restricted, Can Be Exercised In Case Of Palpable Error: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Orders Passed Under Order 39 Rules 1&2 Restricted, Can Be Exercised In Case Of Palpable Error: Delhi HC

High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Orders Passed Under Order 39 Rules 1&2 Restricted, Can Be Exercised In Case Of Palpable Error Case: Anil Kumar Seth…

Continue ReadingHigh Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Orders Passed Under Order 39 Rules 1&2 Restricted, Can Be Exercised In Case Of Palpable Error: Delhi HC
Labour Court Amenable To High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227, Not Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Andhra Pradesh High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Labour Court Amenable To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227, Not Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Labour Court Amenable To High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227, Not Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Andhra Pradesh High Court Case: Mitra S.P. (P)…

Continue ReadingLabour Court Amenable To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227, Not Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Article 227 – Supervisory Jurisdiction Is Not To Correct Every Error When Final Finding Is Justified: Supreme Court

Article 227 - Supervisory Jurisdiction Is Not To Correct Every Error When Final Finding Is Justified Case: Garment Craft vs Prakash Chand Goel Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingArticle 227 – Supervisory Jurisdiction Is Not To Correct Every Error When Final Finding Is Justified: Supreme Court