Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn't Prohibit It: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn’t Prohibit It: Supreme Court

Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn't Prohibit It Case: Pahwa Plastics Pvt. Ltd vs Dastak NGO…

Continue ReadingEx Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn’t Prohibit It: Supreme Court
Article 226 - High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 226 – High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court

Article 226 - High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts Case: State of Gujarat vs R.J. Pathan Coram: Justices MR…

Continue ReadingArticle 226 – High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court
Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court

Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry Case: State of Karnataka vs Umesh Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingAcquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court
Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court

Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record Case: Ratan Lal…

Continue ReadingOrder Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court
Suppression of Information about Criminal Case by Candidate in Selection Process Can Be Ignored In Certain Situations: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Suppression of Information about Criminal Case by Candidate in Selection Process Can Be Ignored In Certain Situations: Supreme Court

Suppression of Information about Criminal Case by Candidate in Selection Process Can Be Ignored In Certain Situations Case: Umesh Chandra Yadav V. The Inspector General…

Continue ReadingSuppression of Information about Criminal Case by Candidate in Selection Process Can Be Ignored In Certain Situations: Supreme Court
Pensioners Of Same Rank May Not Form Homogeneous Class; New Benefits Can Be Prospectively Applied: Supreme Court Summarizes Principles On Pension & Cut-Off Dates - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Pensioners Of Same Rank May Not Form Homogeneous Class; New Benefits Can Be Prospectively Applied: Supreme Court Summarizes Principles On Pension & Cut-Off Dates

Pensioners Of Same Rank May Not Form Homogeneous Class; New Benefits Can Be Prospectively Applied: Supreme Court Summarizes Principles On Pension & Cut-Off Dates Case:…

Continue ReadingPensioners Of Same Rank May Not Form Homogeneous Class; New Benefits Can Be Prospectively Applied: Supreme Court Summarizes Principles On Pension & Cut-Off Dates
OROP Case: Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Can't Be Invoked Based On Minister's Statement & Parliamentary Committee Report - Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

OROP Case: Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Can’t Be Invoked Based On Minister’s Statement & Parliamentary Committee Report – Supreme Court

OROP Case: Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Can't Be Invoked Based On Minister's Statement & Parliamentary Committee Report - Supreme Court Case: Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement And…

Continue ReadingOROP Case: Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Can’t Be Invoked Based On Minister’s Statement & Parliamentary Committee Report – Supreme Court
Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages: Supreme Court

Court Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages Case: State of Punjab vs…

Continue ReadingCourt Fees Act 1870: Ad Valorem Court-Fees Is Payable on Amount Claimed In a Money Suit for Compensation and Damages: Supreme Court
Section 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court

Section 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention Case: Gadadhar Chandra vs State of West Bengal…

Continue ReadingSection 34 IPC: Prior Concert & Pre­arranged Plan Has To Be Established For Conviction Invoking Common Intention: Supreme Court
Section 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement: Supreme Court

Section 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement Case: Nahar Singh…

Continue ReadingSection 190 (1)(b) CrPC- Magistrate Can Summon Person Not Named In Police Report Or FIR If Materials Reveal Prima Facie His Involvement: Supreme Court
No Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension: Supreme Court Upholds Centre's OROP Policy In Defence Forces - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension: Supreme Court Upholds Centre’s OROP Policy In Defence Forces

No Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension Case: Indian Ex Servicemen Movement (An All India Federation Of Military Veterans Organisation…

Continue ReadingNo Legal Mandate That Same Rank Pensioners Must Be Given Same Pension: Supreme Court Upholds Centre’s OROP Policy In Defence Forces
No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court

No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct Case: Abhay Jain vs High Court of Judicature for…

Continue ReadingNo Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court
District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

District Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court

District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution Case: High Court of Delhi v.…

Continue ReadingDistrict Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court
Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence Case:…

Continue ReadingParty Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court
Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice Case: Tedhi Singh…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced Case: Sanjay…

Continue ReadingOrder 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court
States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life Case: SK Naushad Rahman and others vs Union of India Coram: Justice…

Continue ReadingStates Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court
Section 173 CrPC - Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 173 CrPC – Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court

Section 173 CrPC - Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused Case: Luckose Zachariah @ Zak…

Continue ReadingSection 173 CrPC – Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court
Article 226 - Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 226 – Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court

Article 226 - Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued Case: Municipal Corporation Gondia vs Divi Works & Suppliers…

Continue ReadingArticle 226 – Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court
Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court

Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention Case: Krishnamurthy @ Gunodu vs State…

Continue ReadingSection 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court
Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court

Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness Case: Benson George vs Reliance General Insurance…

Continue ReadingPosition Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court
Magistrates Can Appoint & Authorize Advocate Commissioners To Take Possession Of Secured Assets U/Sec 14 SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Magistrates Can Appoint & Authorize Advocate Commissioners To Take Possession Of Secured Assets U/Sec 14 SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court

Magistrates Can Appoint & Authorize Advocate Commissioners To Take Possession Of Secured Assets U/Sec 14 SARFAESI Act Case: NKGSB Cooperative Bank Limited vs Subir Chakravarty…

Continue ReadingMagistrates Can Appoint & Authorize Advocate Commissioners To Take Possession Of Secured Assets U/Sec 14 SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court
SARFAESI Act Has Overriding Effect on Central Excise Act; Dues of Secured Creditor Has Priority over Dues of Central Excise Dept.: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

SARFAESI Act Has Overriding Effect on Central Excise Act; Dues of Secured Creditor Has Priority over Dues of Central Excise Dept.: Supreme Court

SARFAESI Act Has Overriding Effect on Central Excise Act; Dues of Secured Creditor Has Priority over Dues of Central Excise Dept. Case: Punjab National Bank…

Continue ReadingSARFAESI Act Has Overriding Effect on Central Excise Act; Dues of Secured Creditor Has Priority over Dues of Central Excise Dept.: Supreme Court
Service Tax - Exemption Notification Should Not Be Liberally Construed; Assessee Has To Show That He Comes Within Its Purview: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Service Tax – Exemption Notification Should Not Be Liberally Construed; Assessee Has To Show That He Comes Within Its Purview: Supreme Court

Service Tax - Exemption Notification Should Not Be Liberally Construed; Assessee Has To Show That He Comes Within Its Purview Case: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,…

Continue ReadingService Tax – Exemption Notification Should Not Be Liberally Construed; Assessee Has To Show That He Comes Within Its Purview: Supreme Court
Financier Possessing Vehicle - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Financier Possessing Vehicle Based On Hire-Purchase Or Hypothecation Agreement Liable To Pay Tax Under U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act: Supreme Court

Financier Possessing Vehicle Based On Hire-Purchase Or Hypothecation Agreement Liable To Pay Tax Under U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Case: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services…

Continue ReadingFinancier Possessing Vehicle Based On Hire-Purchase Or Hypothecation Agreement Liable To Pay Tax Under U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act: Supreme Court
Duration Of Blacklisting Cannot Be Solely Per Offence: Supreme Court Disapproves Guidelines Framed By Odisha Govt. - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Duration Of Blacklisting Cannot Be Solely Per Offence: Supreme Court Disapproves Guidelines Framed By Odisha Govt.

Duration Of Blacklisting Cannot Be Solely Per Offence: Supreme Court Disapproves Guidelines Framed By Odisha Govt. Case: State of Odisha vs Panda Infraproject Limited Coram:…

Continue ReadingDuration Of Blacklisting Cannot Be Solely Per Offence: Supreme Court Disapproves Guidelines Framed By Odisha Govt.
Section 138 NI Act - Prima Facie Indication That Complaint Is Filed By Authorized Person of Company Sufficient For Magistrate to Take Cognisance: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 138 NI Act – Prima Facie Indication That Complaint Is Filed By Authorized Person of Company Sufficient For Magistrate to Take Cognisance: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act - Prima Facie Indication That Complaint Is Filed By Authorized Person of Company Sufficient For Magistrate to Take Cognisance Case: TRL…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act – Prima Facie Indication That Complaint Is Filed By Authorized Person of Company Sufficient For Magistrate to Take Cognisance: Supreme Court
Compassionate Appointment Policy Cannot Discriminate Against Illegitimate Children Of Deceased Employee: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Compassionate Appointment Policy Cannot Discriminate Against Illegitimate Children Of Deceased Employee: Supreme Court

Compassionate Appointment Policy Cannot Discriminate Against Illegitimate Children Of Deceased Employee Case: Mukesh Kumar vs Union of India Coram: Justices UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat…

Continue ReadingCompassionate Appointment Policy Cannot Discriminate Against Illegitimate Children Of Deceased Employee: Supreme Court
Partition Suit- Plaintiff Not Disentitled to Seek Relief in Second Appeal Merely Because He Did Not File First Appeal against Denial of His Claims by Trial Court: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Partition Suit- Plaintiff Not Disentitled to Seek Relief in Second Appeal Merely Because He Did Not File First Appeal against Denial of His Claims by Trial Court: Supreme Court

Partition Suit- Plaintiff Not Disentitled to Seek Relief in Second Appeal Merely Because He Did Not File First Appeal against Denial of His Claims by…

Continue ReadingPartition Suit- Plaintiff Not Disentitled to Seek Relief in Second Appeal Merely Because He Did Not File First Appeal against Denial of His Claims by Trial Court: Supreme Court
Superannuation Does Not Absolve Employee From Misconduct; Bank Employee Always Holds Position Of Trust: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Superannuation Does Not Absolve Employee From Misconduct; Bank Employee Always Holds Position Of Trust: Supreme Court

Superannuation Does Not Absolve Employee From Misconduct;Bank Employee Always Holds Position Of Trust Case: United Bank of India v. Bachan Prasad Lal Coram: Justices Ajay…

Continue ReadingSuperannuation Does Not Absolve Employee From Misconduct; Bank Employee Always Holds Position Of Trust: Supreme Court
Specific Relief Act - Compensation In Lieu Of Specific Performance Can't Be Granted Unless Specifically Claimed In Plaint: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Specific Relief Act – Compensation In Lieu Of Specific Performance Can’t Be Granted Unless Specifically Claimed In Plaint: Supreme Court

Specific Relief Act - Compensation In Lieu Of Specific Performance Can't Be Granted Unless Specifically Claimed In Plaint Case: Universal Petro Chemicals Ltd vs BP…

Continue ReadingSpecific Relief Act – Compensation In Lieu Of Specific Performance Can’t Be Granted Unless Specifically Claimed In Plaint: Supreme Court