KAAPA-The-High-Court-clarifies-that-subsequent-detention-cannot-exceed-6-months-if-the-first-detention-order-was-passed-prior-to-the-2014-amendment-Kerala-High-Court-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

KAAPA | The High Court clarifies that subsequent detention cannot exceed 6 months if the ‘first detention’ order was passed prior to the 2014 amendment: Kerala High Court

KAAPA | The High Court clarifies that subsequent detention cannot exceed 6 months if the 'first detention' order was passed prior to the 2014 amendment…

Continue ReadingKAAPA | The High Court clarifies that subsequent detention cannot exceed 6 months if the ‘first detention’ order was passed prior to the 2014 amendment: Kerala High Court
Explosive-Substances-Act-The-Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court-overturns-a-conviction-citing-a-delay-of-over-2-years-in-sending-the-sample-for-forensic-analysis-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Explosive Substances Act | The Andhra Pradesh High Court overturns a conviction, citing a delay of over 2 years in sending the sample for forensic analysis

Explosive Substances Act | The Andhra Pradesh High Court overturns a conviction, citing a delay of over 2 years in sending the sample for forensic…

Continue ReadingExplosive Substances Act | The Andhra Pradesh High Court overturns a conviction, citing a delay of over 2 years in sending the sample for forensic analysis
A-person-who-did-not-affix-their-signature-to-a-compromise-but-subsequently-acts-in-accordance-with-its-terms-is-bound-by-the-compromise-decree-Kerala-High-Court-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

A person who did not affix their signature to a compromise but subsequently acts in accordance with its terms is bound by the compromise decree: Kerala High Court

A person who did not affix their signature to a compromise but subsequently acts in accordance with its terms is bound by the compromise decree…

Continue ReadingA person who did not affix their signature to a compromise but subsequently acts in accordance with its terms is bound by the compromise decree: Kerala High Court
Under-the-Wildlife-Protection-Act-the-Bombay-High-Court-dismissed-cases-against-a-pharmaceutical-company-ruling-that-the-cancer-drug-Camptothecin-is-not-considered-forest-produce-bringing-an-end-to-a-legal-battle-that-persisted-for-16-years-The-Law-Communicants
The Law Communicants

Under the Wildlife Protection Act, the Bombay High Court dismissed cases against a pharmaceutical company, ruling that the cancer drug Camptothecin is not considered forest produce, bringing an end to a legal battle that persisted for 16 years

Under the Wildlife Protection Act, the Bombay High Court dismisses cases against a pharmaceutical company, ruling that the cancer drug Camptothecin is not considered forest…

Continue ReadingUnder the Wildlife Protection Act, the Bombay High Court dismissed cases against a pharmaceutical company, ruling that the cancer drug Camptothecin is not considered forest produce, bringing an end to a legal battle that persisted for 16 years