Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Section 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court

Section 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act Case: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs…

Continue ReadingSection 5 Limitation Act Cannot Be Invoked To Condone Delay Beyond Period Prescribed U/Sec 34(3) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Employee Has No Absolute Right To Be Represented In Departmental Proceedings Through Agent Of His Choice: Supreme Court

Employee Has No Absolute Right To Be Represented In Departmental Proceedings Through Agent Of His Choice Case: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) vs Ramesh Chandra…

Continue ReadingEmployee Has No Absolute Right To Be Represented In Departmental Proceedings Through Agent Of His Choice: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Not Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court

Not Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act Case: I-Pay Clearing Services Private Limited…

Continue ReadingNot Always Obligatory To Remit Matter To Arbitration Tribunal Merely Because A Party Filed Application U/s 34(4) Arbitration Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Employee Who Refuses Promotion Offer Not Entitled To Financial Upgradation Merely Because She Suffered Stagnation: Supreme Court

Employee Who Refuses Promotion Offer Not Entitled To Financial Upgradation Merely Because She Suffered Stagnation Case: Union of India vs Manju Arora Coram: Justices R.…

Continue ReadingEmployee Who Refuses Promotion Offer Not Entitled To Financial Upgradation Merely Because She Suffered Stagnation: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Bank Doesn’t Hold Customers Deposit in Trust; Banker-Depositor Relationship That Of Creditor-Debtor: SC

Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit In Trust; Banker-Depositor Relationship That Of Creditor-Debtor Case: N. Raghavender v. State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI Coram: CJI NV Ramana,…

Continue ReadingBank Doesn’t Hold Customers Deposit in Trust; Banker-Depositor Relationship That Of Creditor-Debtor: SC
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

AP (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act- After Grant Of Ownership Certificate In Terms Of Section 38¬E Protected Tenants Are Deemed To Be Owners: SC

AP (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act- After Grant Of Ownership Certificate In Terms Of Section 38¬E Protected Tenants Are Deemed To Be Owners…

Continue ReadingAP (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act- After Grant Of Ownership Certificate In Terms Of Section 38¬E Protected Tenants Are Deemed To Be Owners: SC
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Candidate Cannot Alter Declaration Given About Correctness Of Details During Selection Process: Supreme Court

Candidate Cannot Alter Declaration Given About Correctness Of Details During Selection Process Case: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Manish Bakawale & Ors Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingCandidate Cannot Alter Declaration Given About Correctness Of Details During Selection Process: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Article 14 Does Not Envisage Negative Equality; State Can’t Be Forced To Perpetuate Same Mistake Committed With Respect To Others: Supreme Court

Article 14 Does Not Envisage Negative Equality; State Can't Be Forced To Perpetuate Same Mistake Committed With Respect To Others Case: Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru v.…

Continue ReadingArticle 14 Does Not Envisage Negative Equality; State Can’t Be Forced To Perpetuate Same Mistake Committed With Respect To Others: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

‘When Will A High & Mighty State Owned Insurance Company Realise Its Social Conscience?’: SC Criticizes Challenge Against Compensation For Worker’s Death

'When Will A High & Mighty State Owned Insurance Company Realise Its Social Conscience?': SC Criticizes Challenge Against Compensation For Worker's Death Case: Shantilata Sethy…

Continue Reading‘When Will A High & Mighty State Owned Insurance Company Realise Its Social Conscience?’: SC Criticizes Challenge Against Compensation For Worker’s Death
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Co-Accused Being Not Chargesheeted No Ground To Quash Proceedings Against Accused Who Is Chargesheeted After A Thorough Investigation: Supreme Court

Co-Accused Being Not Chargesheeted No Ground To Quash Proceedings Against Accused Who Is Chargesheeted After A Thorough Investigation Case: Suvarana  Cooperative Bank Ltd v. State…

Continue ReadingCo-Accused Being Not Chargesheeted No Ground To Quash Proceedings Against Accused Who Is Chargesheeted After A Thorough Investigation: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Reliability Or Genuineness Of Allegations Made In FIR/Complaint Cannot Be Gone Into While Exercising Jurisdiction U/Sec 482 CrPC: Supreme Court

Reliability Or Genuineness Of Allegations Made In FIR/Complaint Cannot Be Gone Into While Exercising Jurisdiction U/Sec 482 CrPC Case: State of Odisha vs Pratima Mohanty…

Continue ReadingReliability Or Genuineness Of Allegations Made In FIR/Complaint Cannot Be Gone Into While Exercising Jurisdiction U/Sec 482 CrPC: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Captive Consumers/Captive Users Are Not Liable To Pay Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4): Supreme Court

(Electricity Act, 2003) Captive Consumers/Captive Users Are Not Liable To Pay Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4) Case: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. M/s.…

Continue ReadingCaptive Consumers/Captive Users Are Not Liable To Pay Additional Surcharge Under Section 42(4): Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Insurer Has Duty To Disclose Changed Policy Conditions During Renewal: Supreme Court Grants Mediclaim Relief To Senior Citizens

Insurer Has Duty To Disclose Changed Policy Conditions During Renewal: Supreme Court Grants Mediclaim Relief To Senior Citizens Case: Jacob Punnen and another versus United…

Continue ReadingInsurer Has Duty To Disclose Changed Policy Conditions During Renewal: Supreme Court Grants Mediclaim Relief To Senior Citizens