Skip to content
The Law Communicants_Logo
  • About Us
    • Our Legal Experts
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editorial Board
    • Campus Ambassador
    • Our Partners
  • Services
    • Legal Advice
    • Mentorship
    • Book Appointment
    • Submit Your Post
  • Daily Judgments
    • Supreme Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Odisha High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Events
    • Seminar & Webinars
    • Call for Paper
    • Moot Courts & Debates
    • Call for Chapters
    • Call for Blogs
    • Courses
  • Journal
  • Videos
  • Study Material
    • Books
    • Blog
    • Bare Act
  • Contact Us
  • Toggle website search
Search this website
Menu Close
  • About Us
    • Our Legal Experts
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Student Editorial Board
    • Campus Ambassador
    • Our Partners
  • Services
    • Legal Advice
    • Mentorship
    • Book Appointment
    • Submit Your Post
  • Daily Judgments
    • Supreme Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Odisha High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
  • Opportunities
    • Jobs
    • Internships
    • Events
    • Seminar & Webinars
    • Call for Paper
    • Moot Courts & Debates
    • Call for Chapters
    • Call for Blogs
    • Courses
  • Journal
  • Videos
  • Study Material
    • Books
    • Blog
    • Bare Act
  • Contact Us
  • Toggle website search
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
  • ‏‏‎ ‎
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Delay In Conducting Disciplinary Enquiry Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate It: Supreme Court

  • Post published:September 18, 2021
  • Post category:Daily Judgments

Delay In Conducting Disciplinary Enquiry Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate It Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs Akhilesh Jha Coram: Justices Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Vikram…

Continue ReadingDelay In Conducting Disciplinary Enquiry Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate It: Supreme Court

Recent Posts

  • Pre-Classical School of Criminology: Origins, Ideas, Practices, and Legacy
  • National Conference on Navigating Contemporary Challenges in Defence and Maritime Law
  • Supreme Court: Secretly Recorded Telephonic Conversation of a Spouse Is Admissible Evidence in Matrimonial Cases
  • Supreme Court: Mere Recovery of a Weapon Bearing the Victim’s Blood Group Is Not Enough to Convict for Murder
  • Legal Advisor Vacancy at Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) — Key Details and How to Apply
  • Empanelment of Advocates at EPFO (Haryana Zone), Block Year 2026–28

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



Top Trending Posts

  • Deputy Manager (Law) Vacancy at NALCO – Key Details, Eligibility, and How to Apply
  • Overtime Policies under Labour Laws in India for Private Companies
  • The Champakam Dorairajan Case: A Landmark in Indian Constitutional Law
  • Supreme Court: Secretly Recorded Telephonic Conversation of a Spouse Is Admissible Evidence in Matrimonial Cases
  • Supreme Court Clarifies: MSME Framework Not an Automatic Shield Against SARFAESI Proceedings—Proactive Invocation Needed

Contact Info

  • Address:53A 2nd Floor Main Road, Pandav Nagar Delhi 110092
  • Email:contact@thelawcommunicants.comOpens in your application

Follow Us

  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab
  • Opens in a new tab

Recent Post

  • Pre-Classical School of Criminology: Origins, Ideas, Practices, and Legacy
  • National Conference on Navigating Contemporary Challenges in Defence and Maritime Law
  • Supreme Court: Secretly Recorded Telephonic Conversation of a Spouse Is Admissible Evidence in Matrimonial Cases

Website Stats

  • 622,859 Monthly Visitors
  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
© 2025 | All Rights Reserved | The Law Communicants |
Hey, wait!

Don't forget to subscribe to our newsletter for weekly updates about our events, blogs and various opportunities. 

Enter your email address

Thanks, I’m not interested