Govt Should Not Allow Workers To Remain As Temporary Employees For An Unreasonably Long Time: J&K&L High Court

Govt Should Not Allow Workers To Remain As Temporary Employees For An Unreasonably Long Time: J&K&L High Court

Case: Showkat Ahmad Najar & Ors Vs UT of J&K & Ors.

Coram: Justice Moksha Kazmi Khajuria

Case No.: WP (C) No. 3939/2019

Court Observation: “Government in particular should not allow workers to remain as temporary employees for an unreasonable long period of time; this kind of exploitation of decades makes a temporary employee suffer to the great extent.”

“There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but without the intervention of orders of courts or of tribunals. The question of regularization of the services of such employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases above referred to and in the light of this judgment. In that context, the Union of India, the State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularize as a one time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed.”

Previous Posts

No Intention To Harm Reputation: Calcutta High Court Quashes Defamation Case Against Reporter & Editor Of A Bengali Daily

Family Court Can Restore Application U/S 125 CrPC After Its Dismissal For Default: Orissa High Court

Income Tax Act does not impose any limitation for filing an application for condonation of delay: Kerala High Court

Child Born From Second Wife Of A Deceased Employee Eligible For Compassionate Appointment: Rajasthan High Court

‘Discretion’ Has No Place In Contractual Matters Unless It Is Expressely Incorporated In Contract: Supreme Court

S.134 Evidence Act | Testimony Of Single Eyewitness Can Form Basis For Conviction Provided It Is Of Sterling Quality: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Doctrine Of Group Of Companies, Can’t Implead Third Party To Arbitration: Delhi High Court